I know that PowerPrep is an old program provided when GMAT was administered by ETS.
I didn't want to take the GMATPrep yet (my precious~~ *Golum mode*) when I still have slightly a month to the actual test so I took PP1 just to see where I stand having studied alone for about a month and half.
Well, I didn't do too badly
Q 49 (93%) <- stupid mistakes! arrgg...
V 41 (93%)
Tot 740 (98%)
But I've heard that PowerPrep is easier than the actual exam. To be honest, math appeared much eaier than would be on the actual one (although I've never taken the actual exam but from questions on the forum).
For those who've taken the actual exam and PP, how closely do PP scores resemble the actual scores?
I'm guessing that GMATPrep would be a better challenge.
Btw, no one seems to mention Barron's as one of his studying materials??
Thanks in advance!