Hi namanqqkm,Great questions! Let me address both your concerns.
Understanding the Core Complaint:The argument's third observation implies: "We pay
4x more for stamps, but delivery is just as
SLOW as before."
The Key Insight:The complaint works
only if we assume the old 8-cent delivery was
slow. That's why "taking as long" sounds like a valid complaint.
What Choice E Does:E tells us:
8-cent letters reached their destination within 24 hours.
24 hours = FAST delivery!So if today's
33-cent letters also arrive in ~
24 hours, that's
still fast service. The phrase "as long to get there" no longer sounds like a complaint—you're still getting
quick delivery.
Addressing Your "Shouldn't 33 cents = 12 hours?" Logic:I see where you're coming from, but
be careful about bringing in outside assumptions. The GMAT argument doesn't claim "higher price
should mean proportionally faster service."
The argument
only implies: current service is
slow.
Choice E proves: service was fast THEN, and is still fast NOW.
That's sufficient to
weaken the complaint.
Why Not B?B explains
WHY lobbies are locked (vandalism). But here's the thing:
- Lobbies are
STILL locked
- Customers are
STILL annoyed
An explanation doesn't weaken unless it removes the negative outcome.To truly weaken that observation, you'd need something like: "Most customers
prefer locked lobbies for safety reasons."
That would eliminate the "affront."
B just tells us the
reason for the problem, it doesn't make the problem disappear.
Answer: EHope this creates clarity! The key takeaway: always identify
what exactly the argument is claiming before evaluating answer choices.
namanqqkm
why are we assuming 24 hr is good and when 8 cents letters took 24hr dont you think 33 cents should take less than 24 hrs maybe 12 hrs, why not? this question is not clear in setting the rules according to me. Affronted means something thats's disturbing you from reaching your goal, then option B, says late nights plagued post offices nationwide and thats the reason why the post offices are locked throughout the night. now makes sense and weaken the implication