Last visit was: 20 Nov 2025, 08:08 It is currently 20 Nov 2025, 08:08
Home
GMAT
Messages
Tests
Schools
Events
Rewards
Chat
My Profile
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Back to Forum
Create Topic
   1   2 
805+ Level|   Assumption|      
avatar
rahul0909
avatar
Joined: 05 May 2019
Last visit: 09 Feb 2021
Posts: 4
Own Kudos:
2
 [1]
Given Kudos: 4
Posts: 4
Kudos: 2
 [1]
According to government figures, the rate of people treated for melano 14 Oct 2019, 08:21
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
E is incorrect as it is saying about future increase of rate. The stem talks about the increased rate from 1980 till present time.
A removes a alternate reason for the action to happen and hence should be correct.
User avatar
akbgmatter
User avatar
Joined: 10 Sep 2018
Last visit: 10 Dec 2020
Posts: 16
Own Kudos:
6
Given Kudos: 6
Posts: 16
Kudos: 6
According to government figures, the rate of people treated for melano 14 Oct 2019, 23:29
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I strongly believe that option E is a mere strengthener whereas option A is an appropriate assumption. Can you please help with what your opinion on this question is?
User avatar
itoyj
User avatar
Joined: 03 Sep 2018
Last visit: 16 Aug 2021
Posts: 82
Own Kudos:
65
Given Kudos: 195
Posts: 82
Kudos: 65
According to government figures, the rate of people treated for melano 21 Oct 2019, 01:10
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel GMATNinja
can you please help in this question, the discussion in itself doesn't help much in clarifying confusion between A and E.
User avatar
Aviral1995
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 13 Apr 2019
Last visit: 23 May 2022
Posts: 233
Own Kudos:
68
Given Kudos: 309
Location: India
Schools: McDonough'23 (II) Mendoza'23 (A$) Kelley '23 (A$) Schulich Sept '23 (WA)
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V36
GPA: 3.85
Products:
My Reviews
Schools: McDonough'23 (II) Mendoza'23 (A$) Kelley '23 (A$) Schulich Sept '23 (WA)
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V36
Posts: 233
Kudos: 68
According to government figures, the rate of people treated for melano 25 Oct 2019, 23:57
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
itoyj
Bunuel GMATNinja
can you please help in this question, the discussion in itself doesn't help much in clarifying confusion between A and E.
Show more

GMATNinja VeritasKarishma nightblade354 please explain difference b/w A and E
User avatar
nightblade354
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 31 Jul 2017
Last visit: 20 Nov 2025
Posts: 1,781
Own Kudos:
6,823
Given Kudos: 3,304
Status:He came. He saw. He conquered. -- Going to Business School -- Corruptus in Extremis
Location: United States (MA)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
Schools: Darden '25 (M)
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: Darden '25 (M)
Posts: 1,781
Kudos: 6,823
According to government figures, the rate of people treated for melano 26 Oct 2019, 06:11
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Aviral1995
itoyj
Bunuel GMATNinja
can you please help in this question, the discussion in itself doesn't help much in clarifying confusion between A and E.

GMATNinja VeritasKarishma nightblade354 please explain difference b/w A and E
Show more

I do not do Kaplan questions, as they are usually really flimsy and poor quality.
User avatar
navderm
User avatar
Joined: 30 May 2019
Last visit: 26 May 2023
Posts: 152
Own Kudos:
31
Given Kudos: 331
Location: United States
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V35
GPA: 3.6
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V35
Posts: 152
Kudos: 31
According to government figures, the rate of people treated for melano 31 Oct 2019, 13:21
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
dimmak
According to government figures, the rate of people treated for melanoma, a deadly form of skin cancer, has increased dramatically since 1980. These statistics prove that efforts to halt the destruction of the ozone layer, which serves to filter out the cancer-causing ultraviolet rays of the sun, have been largely unsuccessful.

The conclusion of the argument above depends on which of the following assumptions?


A) The increase in the rate of people treated for melanoma did not result from an improved ability to detect the disease at a treatable stage of development.

B) The chances that an individual who contracts melanoma will survive have not improved since 1980.

C) Due to improvements in medical technology, melanoma patients are more likely to live longer after detection of the disease than they were in 1980.

D) It is highly unlikely that medical researchers will discover a cure for melanoma at any time in the foreseeable future.

E) The rate of melanoma will continue to increase unless the government poses a ban on the use of chlorofluorocarbons, which are largely responsible for the destruction of the ozone layer.
Show more


Premise : rate of people treated for melanoma has increased dramatically since 1980.

Conclusion: The statistics proves that efforts to halt the destruction of ozone layer have largely been unsuccessful.

Let's try to find the ways in which the conclusion is weakened given the premise.

How to get conclusion to weaken(pre-thinking):
1. What if the rate for people being treated was low because there was no way for anyone to find out if someone had melanoma until it was too late.
2. What if there are multiple reasons for melanoma and destruction of ozone is only one.

If these are true, then the statistics do not prove that the efforts to halt the destruction of ozone layer have been unsuccessful.

Hence, the assumptions are :

1. The increase in rate of people in whom the melanoma was detected in earlier stages was not improved.
2. Melanoma can only caused by harmful rays from sun and not anything else, say tanning machine.

The answer is definitely A.

Looking at E.
E) The rate of melanoma will continue to increase unless the government poses a ban on the use of chlorofluorocarbons, which are largely responsible for the destruction of the ozone layer.

How is a conclusion that is trying to prove something based on past result be assuming something from future ? That totally nonsensical.
User avatar
gmat1393
User avatar
Share GMAT Experience Moderator
Joined: 25 Apr 2018
Last visit: 19 Dec 2022
Posts: 644
Own Kudos:
2,545
 [1]
Given Kudos: 199
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
Products:
My Reviews
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
Posts: 644
Kudos: 2,545
 [1]
According to government figures, the rate of people treated for melano 12 Dec 2019, 09:44
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quote:
According to government figures, the rate of people treated for melanoma, a deadly form of skin cancer, has increased dramatically since 1980. These statistics prove that efforts to halt the destruction of the ozone layer, which serves to filter out the cancer-causing ultraviolet rays of the sun, have been largely unsuccessful.

The conclusion of the argument above depends on which of the following assumptions?


A) The increase in the rate of people treated for melanoma did not result from an improved ability to detect the disease at a treatable stage of development.

B) The chances that an individual who contracts melanoma will survive have not improved since 1980.

C) Due to improvements in medical technology, melanoma patients are more likely to live longer after detection of the disease than they were in 1980.

D) It is highly unlikely that medical researchers will discover a cure for melanoma at any time in the foreseeable future.

E) The rate of melanoma will continue to increase unless the government poses a ban on the use of chlorofluorocarbons, which are largely responsible for the destruction of the ozone layer.
Show more
KAPLAN OFFICIAL EXPLANATION

Identify the Question Type:

The phrase "the argument above depends on which of the following assumptions" tells us that this is an Assumption question. When we have an Assumption question, we need to identify the evidence and conclusion, and then find the assumption that links the two together.

Untangle the Stimulus:

Conclusion: Efforts to stop the destruction of the ozone layer have been unsuccessful.

Evidence: The number of" people treated for melanoma, a deadly form of skin cancer ," has increased considerably since 1980. The ozone layer filters out the cancer causing rays of the sun.

Predict the Answer:

We need to determine the assumption that links the evidence to the author’s conclusion. The author assumes that the increase in treatment for melanoma is the related to the destruction of the ozone because it is the ozone that blocks out cancer-causing rays of the sun

Evaluate the Choices:

The only Answer Choice that logically supports the author’s conclusion is Choice (E) that the number of melanoma cases will continue to rise unless the government poses bans on chemicals that are known to destroy the ozone layer.

Choice (A): is out of scope; detecting the disease at a treatable stage is irrelevant to this argument.

Choice (B): is out of scope. Survivor rates of patients with melanoma are not mentioned.

Choice (C): is out of scope. Advancements to medical technology are not relevant to the author’s argument.

Choice (D): is out of scope. A cure for melanoma is not the focus of the author’s argument.
User avatar
anand.prakash90
User avatar
Joined: 21 Mar 2015
Last visit: 11 Dec 2023
Posts: 40
Own Kudos:
6
Given Kudos: 57
Posts: 40
Kudos: 6
According to government figures, the rate of people treated for melano 12 Dec 2019, 21:10
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Option A is there to test whether you are able to identify the premise and conclusion. A is challenging the premise and negating it will not break the conclusion. This is cause-effect assumption where assumption as you prethink is that only the cause is responsible for effect or except the cause mentioned in argument no other cause have that effect.

Thanks
avatar
SUBHASH309
avatar
Joined: 25 Mar 2019
Last visit: 16 May 2022
Posts: 3
Own Kudos:
1
Given Kudos: 98
Posts: 3
Kudos: 1
According to government figures, the rate of people treated for melano 14 Dec 2019, 11:44
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Option E is correct.
Option A negates one possibility for the rise in cancer patients but there might be other reasons, which is not mentioned in A.
Option E links Ozone and Cancer clearly for X-->Y is required.
avatar
Shobhit7
avatar
Joined: 01 Feb 2017
Last visit: 29 Apr 2021
Posts: 240
Own Kudos:
426
Given Kudos: 148
Posts: 240
Kudos: 426
According to government figures, the rate of people treated for melano 17 Dec 2019, 00:59
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The author is using "probable rise in melanoma cases" as the premise to draw conclusion on "Ozone layer depletion".

Clearly, the Assumption should defend against any alternate reason that could lead to this increment in melanoma cases.

Ans A provides one such defender and is the correct answer.
Ans E is a prediction (will continue) and is clearly irrelevant.
avatar
akshay0542
avatar
Joined: 15 Dec 2019
Last visit: 22 Mar 2020
Posts: 8
Own Kudos:
7
Given Kudos: 13
GMAT 1: 590 Q47 V23
GMAT 1: 590 Q47 V23
Posts: 8
Kudos: 7
According to government figures, the rate of people treated for melano 17 Dec 2019, 21:16
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
According to me conclusion is : UV ray is causing Skin cncer
I am trying negation technique
Option A [if we try to negate]- It is saying since early detection has increease rate
Also i want to know how option E is correct ?
avatar
RahulHGGmat
avatar
Joined: 06 Jun 2020
Last visit: 14 Jan 2022
Posts: 78
Own Kudos:
15
Given Kudos: 286
Posts: 78
Kudos: 15
According to government figures, the rate of people treated for melano 29 Dec 2020, 06:10
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Request your explanation on this.

I thought A is the perfect assumption as E is itself a conclusion.

Hoping for a prompt response on this from your side.
User avatar
MartyTargetTestPrep
User avatar
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 24 Nov 2014
Last visit: 11 Aug 2023
Posts: 3,476
Own Kudos:
5,580
 [2]
Given Kudos: 1,430
Status:Chief Curriculum and Content Architect
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Posts: 3,476
Kudos: 5,580
 [2]
According to government figures, the rate of people treated for melano Updated on: 29 Dec 2020, 22:45
Originally posted by MartyTargetTestPrep on 29 Dec 2020, 07:19.
Last edited by MartyTargetTestPrep on 29 Dec 2020, 22:45, edited 1 time in total.
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
RahulHGGmat
Request your explanation on this.

I thought A is the perfect assumption as E is itself a conclusion.

Hoping for a prompt response on this from your side.
Show more
You analysis is correct. (A) is the best choice since arriving at the conclusion requires assuming that there is not an alternative explanation for the change.

Also, (E) is not a necessary assumption. The support for the conclusion does not depend on any assumption about the number of cases of melanoma in the future.
avatar
AndrewN
avatar
Volunteer Expert
Joined: 16 May 2019
Last visit: 29 Mar 2025
Posts: 3,502
Own Kudos:
7,512
 [2]
Given Kudos: 500
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 3,502
Kudos: 7,512
 [2]
According to government figures, the rate of people treated for melano 29 Dec 2020, 09:46
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
RahulHGGmat
Request your explanation on this.

I thought A is the perfect assumption as E is itself a conclusion.

Hoping for a prompt response on this from your side.
Show more
Hello, RahulHGGmat. I see that Marty has already beaten me to the punch, but I will merely add that I was not convinced with any of the answer choices, whose details work against them. I echo what nightblade354 has written above, in this post. (If my back were against the wall and I had to select the best of the five options presented, I would go with Marty.)

- Andrew
avatar
PRNDL
avatar
Joined: 03 Nov 2019
Last visit: 24 Jul 2022
Posts: 26
Own Kudos:
2
Given Kudos: 87
Posts: 26
Kudos: 2
According to government figures, the rate of people treated for melano 07 May 2022, 11:47
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Why is the answer not A ? It clearly provides explanation why an alternate cause for the increase in Melanoma rate is not possible.
User avatar
wickedvikram
User avatar
Joined: 08 Jun 2008
Last visit: 16 Oct 2024
Posts: 175
Own Kudos:
106
Given Kudos: 79
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, General Management
Products:
My Reviews
Posts: 175
Kudos: 106
According to government figures, the rate of people treated for melano 20 May 2023, 22:50
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Edit: I just saw 2 of the experts supporting A and that made me question my analysis

dimmak
According to government figures, the rate of people treated for melanoma, a deadly form of skin cancer, has increased dramatically since 1980. These statistics prove that efforts to halt the destruction of the ozone layer, which serves to filter out the cancer-causing ultraviolet rays of the sun, have been largely unsuccessful.

The conclusion of the argument above depends on which of the following assumptions?
Show more

Since, confusion is between A & E, I'll present my reasons for these two.

Premise: Rate of treatment for people with melanoma increased
Conclusion: Ozone saving efforts failed
Assumption: Ozone depletion is the reason

Quote:
A) The increase in the rate of people treated for melanoma did not result from an improved ability to detect the disease at a treatable stage of development.
Show more
Meaning: Improved detection is not the reason. This definitely strengthens the conclusion. In the absence of any other stronger assumption, this remains the best choice.


Quote:
E) The rate of melanoma will continue to increase unless the government poses a ban on the use of chlorofluorocarbons, which are largely responsible for the destruction of the ozone layer.
Show more
Meaning: CFC or Ozone depletion is the reason. Ambiguous?
Also, future cause and effect could be completely independent of what factor was the cause in past.
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 18,833
Own Kudos:
986
Posts: 18,833
Kudos: 986
According to government figures, the rate of people treated for melano 26 Oct 2025, 09:04
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
   1   2 
Moderators:
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMATNinjaTwo
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
miag
189 posts