Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Originally posted by Legendaddy on 08 Sep 2012, 11:40.
Last edited by Sajjad1994 on 26 Sep 2019, 00:57, edited 1 time in total.
Updated - Complete topic (669).
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
According to legend, Aesculapius bore two daughters, Panacea and Hyegeia, who gave rise to dynasties of healers and hygienists. The schism remains today, in clinical training and in practice; and because of the imperative nature of medical care and the subtlety of health care, the former has tended to dominate. Preventive medicine has as its primary objective the maintenance and promotion of health. It accomplishes this by controlling or manipulating environmental factors that affect health and disease. For example, in Califorina presently there is serious suffering and substantial economic loss because of the failure to introduce controlled fluoridation of public water supplies. Additionally, preventive medicine applies prophylacitc measures against disease by such actions as immunization and specific nutritional measures. Third, it attempts to motivate people to adopt healthful life-styles through education.
For the most part, curative medicine has as its primary objective the removal of disease from the patient. It provides diagnostic techniques to identify the presence and nature of the disease process. While these may be applied on a mass basis in an attempt to "screen" out persons with preclinical disease, they are usually applied after the patient appears with a complaint. Second, it applies treatment to the sick patient. In every case, this is, or should be, individualized according to the particular need of each patient. Third, it utilizes rehabilitation methodologies to return the treated patient to the best possible level of functioning.
While it is true that both preventive medicine and curative medicine require cadres of similarly trained personnel such as planners, administrators, and educators, the underlying delivery systems depend on quite distinctive professional personnel. The requirements for curative medicine call for clinically trained individuals who deal with patients on a one-to-one basis and whose training is based primarily on an understanding of the biological, pathological, and psychological processes that determine an individual's health and disease status. The locus for this training is the laboratory and clinic. Preventive medicine, on the other hand, calls for a very broad of professional personnel, few of whom require clinical expertise. Since their actions apply either to environmental situations or to population groups, their training takes place in a different type of laboratory or in a community not necessarily associated with the clinical locus.
The economic differences between preventive medicine and curative medicine have been extesively descussed, perhaps most convincingly by Winslow in the monograph. The Cost of Sickness and the Price of Health_. The sickness is almost always a negative, nonproductive and harmful state. All resources expended to deal with sickness are therefore fundamentally economically unproductive. Health, on the other hand, has a very high value in our culture. To the extent that healthy members of the population are replaced by sick members, the economy is doubly burdened. Neveretheless, the per capita cost of preventive measures for specific diseases is generally far lower than the per capita cost of curative medicine applied to treatment of the same disease. Prominent examples are dental caries, poliomyelitis and phenylketonuria.
There is an imperative need to provide care for the sick person within a single medical care system, but there is no overriding reason why a linkage is necessary between the two components of a health care system, prevention and treatment. A natioanl health and medical care program composed of semiautonomous systems for personal health care and medical care would have the advantage of clarifying objectives and strategies and of permitting a more equitable division of resources between prevention and cure.
1. It can be inferred that the author regards Winslow's monograph as (A) authoritative (B) incomplete (C) ill conceived (D) well organized (E) highly original
2.The main reason the author advocates separating authority for preventive medicine from that for curative medicine is (A) the urgency of treatment encourages administrators to devote more resources to treatment than to prevention (B) the cost of treating a disease is often much greater than the cost of programs to prevent the disease (C) the professionals who administer preventive health care programs must be more highly trained than ordinary doctors (D) curative medicine deals primarily with individuals who are ill, whereas preventive medicine is applied to healthy people (E) preventive medicine is a relatively recent development, whereas curative medicine has a long history
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Hi, Can u please explain your reasoning for picking A for the 1st question.. i was stuck between A and D. How do we arrive at the correct option??
Show more
This is the OE The author refers to the monograph and continues to make points made by Winslow, and at one point calls him "convincing". D can be eliminated because style is not the point of discussion.
can you pls explain how is answer (a) for 2nd Qn? I am not able to pick any option.
Show more
The last sentence talks about setting up semi-autonomous system for a more equitable division of resources. Also in the previous para there is a comparison of costs. The choice narrows down to A &B. Since cost is a subset of resources and the last line states resources specifically, we can eliminate B.
Some help with Q (2) ? "the urgency of treatment encourages administrators to devote more resources to treatment than to prevention" - where in the passage is there any reference to the "urgency" of either of the two options?
I'm wondering what would be the primary prpose of this passage? 1. Discussing 2 types of medical practice or 2. Compare different types of medical practice
I'm wondering what would be the primary prpose of this passage? 1. Discussing 2 types of medical practice or 2. Compare different types of medical practice
Any discussion is welcome
Thanks!
Show more
I feel this is opiton 1. Not comparison. This is just a discussion on 2 types of medical practice.
Some help with Q (2) ? "the urgency of treatment encourages administrators to devote more resources to treatment than to prevention" - where in the passage is there any reference to the "urgency" of either of the two options?
Show more
I also thought same. Urgency is not discussed. However, B may be the answer, since the cost of curative treatment is higher, might wanna separate the divisions.
" Neveretheless, the per capita cost of preventive measures for specific diseases is generally far lower than the per capita cost of curative medicine applied to treatment of the same disease "
And option A reduces the scope to administrators. And as mentioned, pointing out to urgency implies curtailing the scope for the passage
For Q 2, I feel B has better scope than A.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.