The issue with Answer C is that the sentence takes what should be a modifier and turns it into a separate, independent clause.
In answer C there are 2 clauses connected with a “comma , and” coordinating conjunction. From a grammar standpoint, everything about this part of the sentence seems fine. (Ignoring potential pronoun ambiguity issues)
However, from a contextual and meaning standpoint, things are slightly changed. The author intended the info. following the word “inherited” to be descriptive modifying info about the origins of the “long standing obsession.” Forming this part of the sentence into a new independent clause puts the modifying info. at the same level of importance as the main clause.
This does not follow the author’s intended meaning.
An example:
(1) “Floyd Mayweather Jr. possesses tremendous fighting skill, learned at a young age from his father.”
In this 1st example, the main focus of the sentence is to convey to the reader that Floyd Mayweather Jr is a skilled boxer. At the end of the sentence, as descriptive info., we are also told that these skills were learned from his father when Floyd Jr. was young.
VS.
(2)”Floyd Mayweather Jr. possesses tremendous fighting skills, and Floyd Jr. learned these skills at a young age from his father.”
This next sentence takes what was descriptive, modifying info. and places it at the same level of importance as the main clause. While the 2nd example does not technically have any grammar issues, it changes the context and focus of the sentence.
Maybe someone can explain it a little better.....i’ll see if I can find better examples and explanations.
Hope it helps somewhat
pg03
Can someone please explain why is B right and C wrong?
Posted from my mobile device