I use the attched paper as a guidance for doctoral program ranking in accounting. their technique seems reasonably believable.
Excerpt from paper:
Table 1
Ranking Ph.D. Programs based on SSRN Highly Downloaded Authors Unadjusted for Program Size
Panel A: Inception - 2001 Panel B: Pre-1982 Panel C: 1982-1991 Panel D: 1992-2001
School No. Top Rank No. Top Rank No. Top Rank No. Top Rank
Authors Authors Authors Authors
Chicago 16 1 6 1 6 1.5 4 6
Michigan 14 2.5 0 n/a 5 3.5 9 1
Rochester 14 2.5 2 6.5 4 5.5 8 2
UC Berkeley 13 4 3 3 6 1.5 4 6
Stanford 12 5 3 3 5 3.5 4 6
Iowa 11 6 2 6.5 4 5.5 5 3.5
Columbia 7 7.5 2 6.5 2 9.5 3 11
Univ. Washington 7 7.5 1 12.5 1 16.5 5 3.5
Pennsylvania 5 9.5 0 n/a 2 9.5 3 11
Texas-Austin 5 9.5 1 12.5 1 16.5 3 11
Carnegie Mellon 4 14 3 3 0 n/a 1 21.5
Cornell 4 14 1 12.5 2 9.5 1 21.5
Minnesota 4 14 0 n/a 1 16.5 3 11
MIT 4 14 0 n/a 2 9.5 2 16.5
Northwestern 4 14 0 n/a 1 16.5 3 11
Penn State 4 14 0 n/a 1 16.5 3 11
Purdue 4 14 2 6.5 0 n/a 2 16.5
British Columbia 3 20 0 n/a 0 n/a 3 11
Harvard 3 20 1 12.5 1 16.5 1 21.5
Illinois 3 20 1 12.5 1 16.5 1 21.5
Michigan State 3 20 1 12.5 0 n/a 2 16.5
Ohio State 3 20 1 12.5 1 16.5 1 21.5
Florida 2 24.5 0 n/a 2 9.5 0 n/a
Lancaster 2 24.5 1 12.5 0 n/a 1 21.5
Oxford 2 24.5 0 n/a 0 n/a 2 16.5
UCLA 2 24.5 0 n/a 2 9.5 0 n/a