Last visit was: 26 Apr 2026, 19:20 It is currently 26 Apr 2026, 19:20
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
draftpunk
Joined: 28 Jan 2017
Last visit: 23 Apr 2022
Posts: 55
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 217
Products:
Posts: 55
Kudos: 73
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
MartyTargetTestPrep
User avatar
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 24 Nov 2014
Last visit: 11 Aug 2023
Posts: 3,471
Own Kudos:
5,645
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1,430
Status:Chief Curriculum and Content Architect
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Posts: 3,471
Kudos: 5,645
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
jabhatta2
Joined: 15 Dec 2016
Last visit: 21 Apr 2023
Posts: 1,251
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 188
Posts: 1,251
Kudos: 328
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
jabhatta2
Joined: 15 Dec 2016
Last visit: 21 Apr 2023
Posts: 1,251
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 188
Posts: 1,251
Kudos: 328
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Source - made up

Quote:

(i) I bought a Mercedes, and It is green in color


(i) both independent clauses are 'related to each other' (talking about Mercedes) -- hence, i thought the usage of comma + and is good

By your definition, this would be wrong beause the 2nd clause DON'T FLOW from the 1st clause

Quote:

(ii) John likes to sing, and Alex loves to dance.


(ii) both independent clauses are 'related to each other' (Entertainment genre) -- hence, the usage of comma + and is good

By your definition, this would be wrong beause the 2nd clause DON'T FLOW from the 1st clause

Quote:

(iii) I I bought a Mercedes, and Sam love KFC


(iii) is NOT okay because the 2 independent clauses are NOT 'related to each other' in any meaningful way. Hence usage of comma + and is WRONG

By your definition, this would be wrong beause the 2nd clause DON'T FLOW from the 1st clause
avatar
mdbajaj
Joined: 17 Sep 2021
Last visit: 09 May 2022
Posts: 6
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 6
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello, how could relative pronoun that refer to the far away noun jet engine?
User avatar
EducationAisle
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Last visit: 25 Apr 2026
Posts: 3,906
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 159
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GPA: 3.31
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: ISB
Posts: 3,906
Kudos: 3,586
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mdbajaj
Hello, how could relative pronoun that refer to the far away noun jet engine?
"that" very regularly modifies "far away nouns" on GMAT. There are numerous official sentences that do this.

For example:

The use of lie detectors is based on the assumption that lying produces emotional reactions in an individual that, in turn, create unconscious physiological responses.
- Notice that "that" modifies far away noun "emotional reactions".

However, what makes the current sentence ("Jet engine..") unique is that "that" modifies a noun even before the verb ("is")! This is not at all common, but the fact that this is an official sentence, tells us that this is an acceptable construct.

Remember that nothing can be gained by questioning official sentences; there are only lessons to be learnt :) .

p.s. Our book EducationAisle Sentence Correction Nirvana discusses modifier issues of "which", their application and examples in significant detail. If you or someone is interested, PM me your email-id; I can mail the corresponding section.
User avatar
GMATGuruNY
Joined: 04 Aug 2010
Last visit: 02 Apr 2026
Posts: 1,347
Own Kudos:
3,906
 [1]
Given Kudos: 9
Schools:Dartmouth College
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 1,347
Kudos: 3,906
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
it is generally my practice not to comment on made-up sentences.
That said:

jabhatta2
Source - made up

Quote:

(i) I bought a Mercedes, and It is green in color

A sentence in a book is provided context by the other sentences in the book.
An SC on the GMAT is different.
Because there is no context, it must offer -- all on its own - a self-contained story.

I bought a Mercedes, and it is green.
This sentence would not constitute a viable SC on the GMAT.
The story feels incomplete.
Why is the writer connecting the purchase of the car to the color of the car?
A reader has no idea.
Now consider the following:
I have always loved the colors of spring.
Yesterday I bought a car, and it is green.
Whenever I look at the car, I think of spring.

Now, a reader understands why the purchase of the car is connected to the car's color: the greenness of the car reminds the writer of springtime.

E: A new type of jet engine is being tested, and it could eventually have the capability to propel aircraft anywhere in the world within two hours.
Here, the story is incomplete.
According to the first clause, the engine is new and only now being tested.
Why is this lack of testing data connected to such an amazing capability -- the ability to propel aircraft anywhere in the world in two hours?
A reader has no idea.
While E might work as part of a newspaper article in which the other sentences can provide context, it does not constitute a viable SC.
User avatar
ExpertsGlobal5
User avatar
Experts' Global Representative
Joined: 10 Jul 2017
Last visit: 26 Apr 2026
Posts: 6,257
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 45
Location: India
GMAT Date: 11-01-2019
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 6,257
Kudos: 6,218
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mdbajaj
Hello, how could relative pronoun that refer to the far away noun jet engine?

Hello mdbajaj,

We hope this finds you well.

To answer your query, "that" does not follow the same rule as the "comma + which" construction; "that" can very well refer to a noun or noun phrase that is not next to it.

We hope this helps.
All the best!
Experts' Global Team
User avatar
jabhatta2
Joined: 15 Dec 2016
Last visit: 21 Apr 2023
Posts: 1,251
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 188
Posts: 1,251
Kudos: 328
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATGuruNY
it is generally my practice not to comment on made-up sentences.
That said:

jabhatta2
Source - made up

Quote:

(i) I bought a Mercedes, and It is green in color

A sentence in a book is provided context by the other sentences in the book.
An SC on the GMAT is different.
Because there is no context, it must offer -- all on its own - a self-contained story.

I bought a Mercedes, and it is green.
This sentence would not constitute a viable SC on the GMAT.
The story feels incomplete.
Why is the writer connecting the purchase of the car to the color of the car?
A reader has no idea.
Now consider the following:
I have always loved the colors of spring.
Yesterday I bought a car, and it is green.
Whenever I look at the car, I think of spring.

Now, a reader understands why the purchase of the car is connected to the car's color: the greenness of the car reminds the writer of springtime.

E: A new type of jet engine is being tested, and it could eventually have the capability to propel aircraft anywhere in the world within two hours.
Here, the story is incomplete.
According to the first clause, the engine is new and only now being tested.
Why is this lack of testing data connected to such an amazing capability -- the ability to propel aircraft anywhere in the world in two hours?
A reader has no idea.
While E might work as part of a newspaper article in which the other sentences can provide context, it does not constitute a viable SC.

Hi GMATGuruNY - would you agree -- the rule that the 2nd clause having to logically follow from / having to connect to the 1st clause is a bit 'subjective'. Its not as cut and dry. Maybe it looks un-related to one reader but perhaps to another reader -- it looks related

For example - regarding your question in the yellow
  • I dont see any indication of lack of testing data
  • I see the connection this way -- The Jet engine is being Tested TO CONFIRM if the engine can eventually have such an amazing capability
User avatar
GMATGuruNY
Joined: 04 Aug 2010
Last visit: 02 Apr 2026
Posts: 1,347
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 9
Schools:Dartmouth College
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 1,347
Kudos: 3,906
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
jabhatta2
would you agree -- the rule that the 2nd clause having to logically follow from / having to connect to the 1st clause is a bit 'subjective'. Its not as cut and dry. Maybe it looks un-related to one reader but perhaps to another reader -- it looks related

For example - regarding your question in the yellow
  • I dont see any indication of lack of testing data
  • I see the connection this way -- The Jet engine is being Tested TO CONFIRM if the engine can eventually have such an amazing capability

Since the engine is of a NEW TYPE that is currently BEING TESTED, the capability of the engine seems unknown.
I cannot envision any circumstance under which the GMAT would use and to connect to the first clause to the second.
User avatar
jabhatta2
Joined: 15 Dec 2016
Last visit: 21 Apr 2023
Posts: 1,251
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 188
Posts: 1,251
Kudos: 328
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATGuruNY
jabhatta2
would you agree -- the rule that the 2nd clause having to logically follow from / having to connect to the 1st clause is a bit 'subjective'. Its not as cut and dry. Maybe it looks un-related to one reader but perhaps to another reader -- it looks related

For example - regarding your question in the yellow
  • I dont see any indication of lack of testing data
  • I see the connection this way -- The Jet engine is being Tested TO CONFIRM if the engine can eventually have such an amazing capability

Since the engine is of a NEW TYPE that is currently BEING TESTED, the capability of the engine seems unknown.
I cannot envision any circumstance under which the GMAT would use and to connect to the first clause to the second.


interesting GMATGuruNY - you mention the capability of this new engine is unknown.

the piece prior to the underline indicates the capability has been already developed over 40 years, no ?

Now that all the amazing capabilities have been developed (over 40 years) --- the testing phase is going on

Quote:

option E)
After more than four decades of research and development, a new type of jet engine is being tested, and it could eventually have the capability to propel aircraft anywhere in the world within two hours or help boost cargoes into space at significantly lower costs than current methods permit.
User avatar
GMATGuruNY
Joined: 04 Aug 2010
Last visit: 02 Apr 2026
Posts: 1,347
Own Kudos:
3,906
 [1]
Given Kudos: 9
Schools:Dartmouth College
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 1,347
Kudos: 3,906
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
jabhatta2
GMATGuruNY
jabhatta2
would you agree -- the rule that the 2nd clause having to logically follow from / having to connect to the 1st clause is a bit 'subjective'. Its not as cut and dry. Maybe it looks un-related to one reader but perhaps to another reader -- it looks related

For example - regarding your question in the yellow
  • I dont see any indication of lack of testing data
  • I see the connection this way -- The Jet engine is being Tested TO CONFIRM if the engine can eventually have such an amazing capability

Since the engine is of a NEW TYPE that is currently BEING TESTED, the capability of the engine seems unknown.
I cannot envision any circumstance under which the GMAT would use and to connect to the first clause to the second.


interesting GMATGuruNY - you mention the capability of this new engine is unknown.

the piece prior to the underline indicates the capability has been already developed over 40 years, no ?

Now that all the amazing capabilities have been developed (over 40 years) --- the testing phase is going on

Quote:

option E)
After more than four decades of research and development, a new type of jet engine is being tested, and it could eventually have the capability to propel aircraft anywhere in the world within two hours or help boost cargoes into space at significantly lower costs than current methods permit.

to develop X = to bring X into existence
The introductory modifier in E indicates only that a new type of engine has been BROUGHT INTO EXISTENCE.
It indicates nothing about the capability of the engine.

OA: a new type of engine...that could eventually propel aircraft anywhere in the world within two hours.
Here, the purpose of the that-modifier in blue is the DEFINE the expected capability of the engine.

E: After more than four decades of research and development, a new type of jet engine is being tested.
Here, the clause in red lacks the essential that-modifier:
As a result, the capability of the engine is unknown.
User avatar
thangvietnam
Joined: 29 Jun 2017
Last visit: 04 Apr 2026
Posts: 743
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2,198
Posts: 743
Kudos: 419
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
on gmat, we frequently meet a case in which the correct answer is a strange pattern and other choice contain clear error. we can eliminate the choices with clear error and face the remaining choice which is strange. learn to take the strange choice because we have no reason to eliminate it. it is great if we know the strange pattern but not to remember it.

choice b,c and d contain clear error. they contain unparallel items. choice e contain unidiomatic "capability to do" . it should be capability of doing
avatar
keepmovingfw27
Joined: 21 Nov 2020
Last visit: 05 Jan 2023
Posts: 21
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 332
Posts: 21
Kudos: 7
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
After more than four decades of research and development, a new type of jet engine is being tested that could eventually propel aircraft anywhere in the world within two hours or help boost cargoes into space at significantly lower costs than current methods permit.

(A) tested that could eventually propel aircraft anywhere in the world within two hours or help
-> Correct. "that" modify the jet engine. could propel...or help...-> perfectly parallel
(B) tested that could eventually have the capability of propelling aircraft anywhere in the world within two hours or to help
-> redundancy + parallel error
(C) tested, eventually able to propel aircraft anywhere in the world within two hours, or helping
-> parallel error
(D) tested, and it eventually could propel aircraft anywhere in the world within two hours or helping
-> parallel error
(E) tested, and it could eventually have the capability to propel aircraft anywhere in the world within two hours or help[/quote]
-> redundancy
User avatar
Piotrek
Joined: 26 Oct 2016
Last visit: 27 Apr 2024
Posts: 13
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 8
Posts: 13
Kudos: 3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I thought that if we have verbs help or start and verb right after it then it should be 'ing' so for example here it would be help boosting. Given that this is correct, I assume that it's not a case that we always need to have 'ing' after this verb. Am I right?

If I'm right, could you please send me a list of verbs after which we have 'ing' verb?
User avatar
ExpertsGlobal5
User avatar
Experts' Global Representative
Joined: 10 Jul 2017
Last visit: 26 Apr 2026
Posts: 6,257
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 45
Location: India
GMAT Date: 11-01-2019
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 6,257
Kudos: 6,218
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Piotrek
I thought that if we have verbs help or start and verb right after it then it should be 'ing' so for example here it would be help boosting. Given that this is correct, I assume that it's not a case that we always need to have 'ing' after this verb. Am I right?

If I'm right, could you please send me a list of verbs after which we have 'ing' verb?

Hello Piotrek,

We hope this finds you well.

To answer your query, yes; there is no rule that the verb "help" must be followed by the "verb+ing" form; here, "help" is followed by the base form of the verb "boost" because it is part of the simple future tense verb phrase "could...help boost".

We hope this helps.
All the best!
Experts' Global Team
User avatar
MayaK
Joined: 26 Dec 2022
Last visit: 04 Apr 2024
Posts: 11
Given Kudos: 240
Posts: 11
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi experts!
the "that" comes after tested but modifies the engine, how it is possible?
i thought "that" always modifies the closest word to the right
User avatar
DmitryFarberMPrep
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Last visit: 03 Mar 2026
Posts: 3,005
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 57
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 745 Q86 V90 DI85
Posts: 3,005
Kudos: 8,627
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
MayaK

You'll find that "always" is not much of a thing in Sentence Correction. Noun modifiers, including phrases that begin with WHICH or THAT, tend to modify the adjoining noun. Occasionally, if the meaning is clear enough, the GMAT will allow an intervening modifier or verb. We just don't want something like "My mom reads a lot of books, who is curious about the world."
   1   2 
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
506 posts
361 posts