iridescent995
Hi,
Thanks for your reply.
So does it mean we should not be concerned about the tense of the participle /modifier? Confused here... parallel entities should also agree in tense also right??
My doubt is can aimed be a better option here
Hello
iridescent995,
We hope this finds you well.
Multiple actions referring to the same subject can be in different tenses if the sentence is meant to convey that the subject took different actions in different time periods. For example, "He was on time yesterday but is late today."; here, two verbs are joined by a conjunction ("and"), meaning they must be parallel, but "was" is in the simple past because it refers to an action "He" took in the past, and "is" is in the present tense because it refers to an action that "He" is taking in the current time frame. In such cases, the elements are said to be parallel if they are either both active verbs with the same phrase structure or both participles.
Thus, "aimed" is not correct here, as the intended meaning is that the "The Boy Scouts" is currently and continuously aiming to inspire a sense of virility in young men.
We hope this helps.
All the best!
Experts' Global Team
I was reading your answer (many thanks for it) and a small doubt popped up in my head.
Your example read, "He was on time yesterday but is late today." Shouldn't it be- "He was on time yesterday, but he is late today." You omitted a comma and didn't repeat the subject for the second clause. Is this correct on GMAT? Can you pls share your thoughts on this?