Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
(N/A)
Question Stats:
60%
(01:18)
correct 40%
(02:48)
wrong
based on 6
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Although perioral dermatilis rashes are believed to be caused by reactions to sodium laurel sulfate (SLS) found in shampoos and other personal care products, instructing patients to eliminate all products with SLS frequently does not stop perioral dermatilis. Obviously, some other cause of perioral dermatilis besides reaction to SLS exist.
Which of the following would most seriously weaken the conclusion?
a. Many personal care products elicit an allergic skin response only after several days, making it very difficult to observe between specific products patients use and the perioral dermatilis they develop b. Skin allergies affect many people who never develop the symptom of perioral dermatilis c. Many patients report that the personal care products that cause them perioral dermatilis are among the products they most enjoy using d. Very few patients have allergic skin reactions as children and then live rash-free adult lives once they have eliminated products to which they have been demondstrated to be allergic e. Very rarely do personal care products cause patients to suffer a symptom more severe than that of perioral dermatilis rashes
If the reaction comes in a few days after the product was used, it means that the probability of that there are many other causes of rashes increases (there could be many more other reasons in those several days. Hence, this makes the statement even stronger! Where am I wrong?)
Please explain.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
I found the official explanation to this, but it is really weird...
"If it is difficult to determine which products cause dermatilis, then some products that cause rashes might not have been demonstrated to do so. Hence, eliminating products that have been demonstrated to cause dermatilis might not eliminate dermailis, even if personal care products are the only cause of dermatilis. Choice A is the best answer".
The answer should be A. Nothing else really makes sense. But I do agree that the official explanation is very confusing.
Here is how I see it. It's stated that perioral dermatilis rashes are believed to be caused by reactions to sodium laurel sulfate (SLS). Therefore it shouldn't be used by those who don't want to get perioral dermatilis. However, the premise of the arugument is that since some people don't get a rash right after using it then it must not be the cause of perioral dermatilis.
Answer A states since that many people do not necessarily develop a reaction right away, it is difficult to determine what was the cause of the rash. So a person could have used SLS but did not develop a rash right away, but instead developed the rash at a later time. Therefore SLS was still the cause of the rash even though the person did not develop perioral dermatilis right away which weakens the argument that if no rash is observed after using SLS then it does not cause perioral dermatilis.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.