Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Nov 1811:00 AM PST
-12:00 PM PST
Join us in a live GMAT practice session and solve 30 challenging GMAT questions with other test takers in timed conditions, covering GMAT Quant, Data Sufficiency, Data Insights, Reading Comprehension, and Critical Reasoning questions.
Nov 2211:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment- Nov 23
11:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Attend this free GMAT Algebra Webinar and learn how to master the most challenging Inequalities and Absolute Value problems with ease. 
Nov 2510:00 AM EST
-11:00 AM EST
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
06 Apr 2022, 07:30
Kudos
Bookmarks
Question 1
B
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
15%
(low)
Question Stats:
77% (02:40) correct
23%
(02:27) wrong
based on 222
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Question 2
D
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
55%
(hard)
Question Stats:
51% (01:14) correct 49%
(01:09) wrong
based on 217
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Question 3
E
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
35%
(medium)
Question Stats:
57% (00:44) correct 43%
(01:06) wrong
based on 215
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Question 4
A
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
55%
(hard)
Question Stats:
56% (01:12) correct 44%
(01:32) wrong
based on 203
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Among the speculative questions which arise in connection with the study of arithmetic from a historical standpoint, the origin of number is one that has provoked much lively discussion, and has led to a great amount of learned research among the primitive and savage languages of the human race. A few simple considerations will, however, show that such research must necessarily leave this question entirely unsettled, and will indicate clearly that it is, from the very nature of things, a question to which no definite and final answer can be given. Among the barbarous tribes whose languages have been studied, even in a most cursory manner, none have ever been discovered which did not show some familiarity with the number concept. The knowledge thus indicated has often proved to be most limited; not extending beyond the numbers 1 and 2, or 1, 2, and 3. At first thought it seems quite inconceivable that any human being should be destitute of the power of counting beyond 2. But such is the case; and in a few instances languages have been found to be absolutely destitute of pure numeral words.
These facts must of necessity deter the mathematician from seeking to push his investigation too far back toward the very origin of number. Philosophers have endeavoured to establish certain propositions concerning this subject, but, as might have been expected, have failed to reach any common ground of agreement. Whewell has maintained that “such propositions as that two and three make five are necessary truths, containing in them an element of certainty beyond that which mere experience can give.” Mill, on the other hand, argues that any such statement merely expresses a truth derived from early and constant experience; and in this view he is heartily supported by Tylor.
But why this question should provoke controversy, it is difficult for the mathematician to understand. Either view would seem to be correct, according to the standpoint from which the question is approached. We know of no language in which the suggestion of number does not appear, and we must admit that the words which give expression to the number sense would be among the early ords to be formed in any language. They express ideas which are, at first, wholly concrete, which are of the greatest possible simplicity, and which seem in many ways to be clearly understood, even by the higher orders of the brute creation. The origin of number would in itself, then, appear to lie beyond the proper limits of inquiry; and the primitive conception of number to be fundamental with human thought.
These facts must of necessity deter the mathematician from seeking to push his investigation too far back toward the very origin of number. Philosophers have endeavoured to establish certain propositions concerning this subject, but, as might have been expected, have failed to reach any common ground of agreement. Whewell has maintained that “such propositions as that two and three make five are necessary truths, containing in them an element of certainty beyond that which mere experience can give.” Mill, on the other hand, argues that any such statement merely expresses a truth derived from early and constant experience; and in this view he is heartily supported by Tylor.
But why this question should provoke controversy, it is difficult for the mathematician to understand. Either view would seem to be correct, according to the standpoint from which the question is approached. We know of no language in which the suggestion of number does not appear, and we must admit that the words which give expression to the number sense would be among the early ords to be formed in any language. They express ideas which are, at first, wholly concrete, which are of the greatest possible simplicity, and which seem in many ways to be clearly understood, even by the higher orders of the brute creation. The origin of number would in itself, then, appear to lie beyond the proper limits of inquiry; and the primitive conception of number to be fundamental with human thought.
1. What is the primary purpose of the passage?
(A) To outline the history of mathematics
(B) To discuss the origin of numbers
(C) To resolve a dispute about the use of numbers
(D) To critique the ancient tribes for use of numbers
(E) To discuss the effects of numbers on society
(A) To outline the history of mathematics
(B) To discuss the origin of numbers
(C) To resolve a dispute about the use of numbers
(D) To critique the ancient tribes for use of numbers
(E) To discuss the effects of numbers on society
2. The author of the passage would most probably agree with each of the following EXCEPT:
(A) Almost all primitive societies were using some form of numbers.
(B) Mathematicians are divided in their views about the origin of numbers.
(C) Numerical words were part of ancient languages.
(D) The concept of numbers finds its origin in barbarous tribes.
(E) The issue of the origin of numbers should not be a controversial one.
(A) Almost all primitive societies were using some form of numbers.
(B) Mathematicians are divided in their views about the origin of numbers.
(C) Numerical words were part of ancient languages.
(D) The concept of numbers finds its origin in barbarous tribes.
(E) The issue of the origin of numbers should not be a controversial one.
3. The mathematicians consider the debate on the origin of numbers as:
(A) Enlightening
(B) Essential
(C) Obligatory
(D) Compulsory
(E) Unnecessary
(A) Enlightening
(B) Essential
(C) Obligatory
(D) Compulsory
(E) Unnecessary
4. What does the line, in the third para, ‘primitive conception of number to be fundamental with human thought’ mean?
(A) Numbers are an inevitable creation of every language.
(B) Numbers have been a conscious creation of every language.
(C) Numbers have been interpreted differently by different tribes.
(D) There is a perennial debate over the origin of numbers.
(E) Numbers were incorporated strategically by the primitive tribes.
(A) Numbers are an inevitable creation of every language.
(B) Numbers have been a conscious creation of every language.
(C) Numbers have been interpreted differently by different tribes.
(D) There is a perennial debate over the origin of numbers.
(E) Numbers were incorporated strategically by the primitive tribes.
RC Butler 2022 - Practice Two RC Passages Everyday.
Passage # 140 Date: 06-Apr-2022
This question is a part of RC Butler 2022. Click here for Details
Passage # 140 Date: 06-Apr-2022
This question is a part of RC Butler 2022. Click here for Details
13 Jun 2022, 06:12
Kudos
Bookmarks
13 Jun 2022, 06:53
Kudos
Bookmarks
Ghostrider3147
Official Explanation
4. What does the line, in the third para, ‘primitive conception of number to be fundamental with human thought’ mean?
Explanation
Inferred from para 3, the author talks of how numbers have always been a part of the language skills of all primitive tribes researched till date. This is especially noted by all that even if the counting included only numbers 1, 2 and 3, the tribes were using it advantageously. Hence, option (A) is the correct answer.
(B) The word ‘conscious’ is misleading since the inclusion of the numbers was instinctive rather than planned.
(C) The passage never states or implies this.
(D) While this may be true, it does not have any reference to the context here.
(E) Same as B.
Answer: A
Explanation
Inferred from para 3, the author talks of how numbers have always been a part of the language skills of all primitive tribes researched till date. This is especially noted by all that even if the counting included only numbers 1, 2 and 3, the tribes were using it advantageously. Hence, option (A) is the correct answer.
(B) The word ‘conscious’ is misleading since the inclusion of the numbers was instinctive rather than planned.
(C) The passage never states or implies this.
(D) While this may be true, it does not have any reference to the context here.
(E) Same as B.
Answer: A
