|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Updated on: 16 Oct 2025, 02:02
Originally posted by Sajjad1994 on 12 Oct 2025, 09:00.
Last edited by Sajjad1994 on 16 Oct 2025, 02:02, edited 1 time in total.
Last edited by Sajjad1994 on 16 Oct 2025, 02:02, edited 1 time in total.
Kudos
Bookmarks
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
(N/A)
Question Stats:
50% (00:27) correct
50% (00:38) wrong based on 2 sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Amusingly enough, lawyers sometimes drive their sport cars in the same fashion that they construct their cases: a lawyer noted for the ________ of his arguments, for example, may also be known for the circuitousness of his routes.
A. brevity
B. pertinacity
C. judiciousness
D. deviousness
E. conciseness
F. indirectness
A. brevity
B. pertinacity
C. judiciousness
D. deviousness
E. conciseness
F. indirectness
GRE Verbal Sprint 2025
05 Days | 30 Questions | Win Prizes | Get Better at GRE
Question # 18 | Date: 12 October 2025
[Click here for more details and master thread]
05 Days | 30 Questions | Win Prizes | Get Better at GRE
Question # 18 | Date: 12 October 2025
[Click here for more details and master thread]
14 Oct 2025, 02:19
Kudos
Bookmarks
Official Explanation
The key word here is circuitousness. The writer here is developing an analogy between the way lawyers drive their cars and the way they build or construct their legal arguments. Thus, someone known for choosing circuitous (roundabout; twisty) routes might also be known for coming up with devious (tricky; oblique) or indirect (roundabout; not direct) arguments.
Answer: D,F
The key word here is circuitousness. The writer here is developing an analogy between the way lawyers drive their cars and the way they build or construct their legal arguments. Thus, someone known for choosing circuitous (roundabout; twisty) routes might also be known for coming up with devious (tricky; oblique) or indirect (roundabout; not direct) arguments.
Answer: D,F
