It is currently 19 Nov 2017, 09:40

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

An Interesting Modifier touching rule ambiguity from an OG question

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 07 Feb 2017
Posts: 15

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

An Interesting Modifier touching rule ambiguity from an OG question  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Apr 2017, 12:36
Hi experts
Could you please make this rule more clear for me. I'm struggling here. We know that the modifier touch rule has some exceptions such as vital modifiers in between the modifier and the noun to be modified are permitted. But apart from that , are these two rules mentioned below absolute ?

1) modifier must touch the noun it modifies in the sense that pattern must be "noun then modifier "

Or

2) in the opening modifiers are allowed to come before noun and touch it


So does that mean below sentence will be wrong ?


Question 787 from 2017 OG

Option B

In her book illustrations , carefully coordinating them with her narratives , Beatrix Potter capitalized on her keen observation and love of the natural word.

"Verbal modifier , noun modifier , noun "
structure allowed ? Although touching happens here it could be interpreted as noun modifier in the middle modifying "illustrations" instead of Beatrix Potter .

What's is the rule in this case ?

Thanks a ton in advance :)


Sent from my iPhone using GMAT Club Forum mobile app

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 07 Feb 2017
Posts: 15

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

Re: An Interesting Modifier touching rule ambiguity from an OG question [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Apr 2017, 05:30
None ? :( :(


Sent from my iPhone using GMAT Club Forum

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

Expert Post
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
User avatar
G
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4488

Kudos [?]: 8741 [0], given: 105

Re: An Interesting Modifier touching rule ambiguity from an OG question [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 May 2017, 16:40
ramukaka wrote:
Hi experts
Could you please make this rule more clear for me. I'm struggling here. We know that the modifier touch rule has some exceptions such as vital modifiers in between the modifier and the noun to be modified are permitted. But apart from that , are these two rules mentioned below absolute ?

1) modifier must touch the noun it modifies in the sense that pattern must be "noun then modifier "
Or
2) in the opening modifiers are allowed to come before noun and touch it

So does that mean below sentence will be wrong ?

Question 787 from 2017 OG

Option B

In her book illustrations , carefully coordinating them with her narratives , Beatrix Potter capitalized on her keen observation and love of the natural world.

"Verbal modifier , noun modifier , noun "
structure allowed ? Although touching happens here it could be interpreted as noun modifier in the middle modifying "illustrations" instead of Beatrix Potter .

What's is the rule in this case ?

Thanks a ton in advance :)

Dear ramukaka,

I'm happy to respond. :-)

1) Noun modifiers that have to "touch" the noun can touch it on either side--either immediately before the noun or immediately after the noun.
2) Only noun modifiers are subject to the "touch rule." Verb modifiers are considerably freer in their placement: the "touch rule" is entirely irrelevant to verb modifiers.
3) That sentence from the OG is 100% correct.

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Image

Image

Education is not the filling of a pail, but the lighting of a fire. — William Butler Yeats (1865 – 1939)

Kudos [?]: 8741 [0], given: 105

Re: An Interesting Modifier touching rule ambiguity from an OG question   [#permalink] 30 May 2017, 16:40
Display posts from previous: Sort by

An Interesting Modifier touching rule ambiguity from an OG question

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Moderator: mikemcgarry



GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.