Bunuel
An old Russian proverb says you should "Eat your breakfast alone, eat your lunch with your friend, give your dinner to your enemy." A new school of dietitians would have it, therefore, that missing dinner twice a week actually contributes not only to the patients' weight loss, but also to their general health.
The new school of dietitians' argument is based on which of the following assumptions?
A. While the Russian proverb argues that dinner is a problematic meal, it does not promote forsaking it altogether.
B. Eating dinner with enemies is a sign of reconciliation, which may improve one's health.
C. While eating solids is to be encouraged at breakfast and is permissible during lunch, Dinner should contain only fluids.
D. The Russian proverb states that one should give his dinner to his enemy, so that one never has dinner.
E. Russian metabolism works differently from western metabolism, and therefore while for the Russian the evening meal is merely problematic, the westerner should actually do without it.
Official Explanation
An old Russian proverb says you should "Eat your breakfast alone, eat your lunch with your friend, give your dinner to your enemy." A new school of dietitians would have it, therefore, that missing dinner twice a week actually contributes not only to the patients' weight loss, but also to their general health.
The new school of dietitians' argument is based on which of the following assumptions?A. While the Russian proverb argues that dinner is a problematic meal, it does not promote forsaking it altogether.
This Assumption question focuses on the gap between the Russian proverb and health-related advice the dietitians give based on that proverb.
Viewed schematically, the argument runs as follows:
Premise: Breakfast is good, lunch is okay and dinner is problematic.
Conclusion: Miss dinner twice a week to lose weight and improve your health.
You are requested to find an assumption that connects between the premise and the conclusion:
Premise + Assumption = Conclusion.
The dietitians assume that the Russian proverb doesn't mean one shouldn't eat dinner at all; it only means one should avoid it now and then. This explains the difference between the premise and conclusion.B. Eating dinner with enemies is a sign of reconciliation, which may improve one's health.
Incorrect.
This Assumption question focuses on the gap between the Russian proverb and health-related advice the dietitians give based on that proverb.
Viewed schematically, the argument runs as follows:
Premise: Breakfast is good, lunch is okay and dinner is problematic.
Conclusion: Miss dinner twice a week to lose weight and improve your health.
You are requested to find an assumption that connects between the premise and the conclusion:
Premise + Assumption = Conclusion.
If the dietitians thought eating dinner with enemies was good for one's health, they wouldn't recommend missing dinner twice a week.C. While eating solids is to be encouraged at breakfast and is permissible during lunch, Dinner should contain only fluids.
Incorrect.
This answer choice does not bridge the gap between the premise and the conclusion. If the assumption were that dinner should consist of fluids, the conclusion would speak of fluids, not missing dinner.D. The Russian proverb states that one should give his dinner to his enemy, so that one never has dinner.
Incorrect.
If the dietitians thought the proverb promotes not eating dinner at all, they wouldn't recommend missing it only twice a week.E. Russian metabolism works differently from western metabolism, and therefore while for the Russian the evening meal is merely problematic, the westerner should actually do without it.
Incorrect.
The conclusion of the dietitians makes no differentiation between Westerners and Russians.