Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Most GMAT test-takers are intimidated by the hardest GMAT Verbal questions. In this session, Target Test Prep GMAT instructor Erika Tyler-John, a 100th percentile GMAT scorer, will show you how top scorers break down challenging Verbal questions..
Register for the GMAT Club Virtual MBA Spotlight Fair – the world’s premier event for serious MBA candidates. This is your chance to hear directly from Admissions Directors at nearly every Top 30 MBA program..
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
(N/A)
Question Stats:
0%
(00:00)
correct 100%
(00:43)
wrong
based on 5
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Are bureaucrats better at allocating resources than the market? No. The biggest reason why "intervention" policies did not result in bad investment is that although the east Asian superstars deviated from free-market policies they did so by less than most other developing countries: the prices of capital and labor were less distorted than in most of Latin America.
The writer of the above passage is suggesting that
A) Capital and Labor were under-priced in East Asia. B) "Interventionist" policies resulted in poor economic performance for many Latin American countries. C) "Interventionist" policies caused poor economic performance in many developing countries. D) Bureaucrats should stop allocating resources. E) None of the above.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Are bureaucrats better at allocating resources than the market? No. The biggest reason why "intervention" policies did not result in bad investment is that although the east Asian superstars deviated from free-market policies they did so by less than most other developing countries: the prices of capital and labor were less distorted than in most of Latin America.
deviating less from free market policies(intervention policies) resulted in no bad investment.
The writer of the above passage is suggesting that
A) Capital and Labor were under-priced in East Asia. FALSE B) "Interventionist" policies resulted in poor economic performance for many Latin American countries. FALSE because the passage says resulted in no bad investment C) "Interventionist" policies caused poor economic performance in many developing countries. TRUE? Because in this context he says intervention policies did not result in bad investment which means that in the original context they mention most other developing countries. D) Bureaucrats should stop allocating resources. FALSE. out of scope E) None of the above.
Definitely not GMAT but I am going with C. OA?
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.