Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
May 1810:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Join us in a live GMAT practice session and solve 25 challenging GMAT questions with other test takers in timed conditions, covering GMAT Quant, Data Sufficiency, Data Insights, Reading Comprehension, and Critical Reasoning questions.
May 1212:00 PM EDT
-11:59 PM EDT
Make the most of your break with the most realistic GMAT™ prep. Take up to $700 off select products. Ends 6/1
May 1501:00 PM IST
-11:00 AM IST
Start your journey with a fully customized action plan and work with a dedicated mentor to achieve a 735+ score.- May 19
12:00 PM PDT
-01:00 PM PDT
Scoring 329 on the GRE is not always about using more books, more courses, or a longer study plan. In this episode of GRE Success Talks, Ashutosh shares his GRE preparation strategy, study plan, and test-day experience, explaining how he kept his prep.... - Jun 10
06:00 AM PDT
-06:15 PM PDT
Register for the GMAT Club Virtual MBA Spotlight Fair – the world’s premier event for serious MBA candidates. This is your chance to hear directly from Admissions Directors at nearly every Top 30 MBA program..
03 May 2021, 23:10
Kudos
Bookmarks
Had to sit on this one for a second. This question is fundamentally a matter of meaning. A is nonsense. Joan wouldn't attend all of those meetings as the former chair, at least this is not what the sentence intends.
E.
E.
sonalchhajed2019
Joined: 06 Apr 2018
Last visit: 29 May 2023
Posts: 111
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 336
Location: India
Schools: ISB '23 (S)
GMAT 1: 560 Q43 V23
GMAT 2: 680 Q50 V33
GMAT 3: 710 Q49 V37
GPA: 3.64
Products:
11 Oct 2021, 00:30
Kudos
Bookmarks
As the former chair of the planning board for 18 consecutive years and a board member for 28 years, Joan Philkill attended more than 400 meetings and reviewed more than 700 rezoning applications.
(A) As the former
(B) The former
(C) Former
(D) She was
(E) As the
GMATNinja VeritasKarishma AjiteshArun
I understand the correct answer choice is E. It makes a lot more sense meaning-wise as compared to the other options.
But I want to know whether Options B and C are grammatically correct.
B. The former chair of the planning board for 18 consecutive years and a board member for 28 years, Joan Philkill attended more than 400 meetings and reviewed more than 700 rezoning applications.
In the above sentence "The former chair of the planning board for 18 consecutive years and a board member for 28 years" is acting as a modifier.
So the structure is Modifier, Independent clause.
I do not see an issue here. Please help me understand why this is incorrect.
C. Former chair of the planning board for 18 consecutive years and a board member for 28 years, Joan Philkill attended more than 400 meetings and reviewed more than 700 rezoning applications.
In the above sentence "Former chair of the planning board for 18 consecutive years and a board member for 28 years" is acting as a modifier.
So the structure is Modifier, Independent clause.
I do not see an issue here as well. Please help me understand why this is incorrect.
Also, I want to understand what is the difference between Option B and C. Whether the article "the" is necessary, and if yes, why?
(A) As the former
(B) The former
(C) Former
(D) She was
(E) As the
GMATNinja VeritasKarishma AjiteshArun
I understand the correct answer choice is E. It makes a lot more sense meaning-wise as compared to the other options.
But I want to know whether Options B and C are grammatically correct.
B. The former chair of the planning board for 18 consecutive years and a board member for 28 years, Joan Philkill attended more than 400 meetings and reviewed more than 700 rezoning applications.
In the above sentence "The former chair of the planning board for 18 consecutive years and a board member for 28 years" is acting as a modifier.
So the structure is Modifier, Independent clause.
I do not see an issue here. Please help me understand why this is incorrect.
C. Former chair of the planning board for 18 consecutive years and a board member for 28 years, Joan Philkill attended more than 400 meetings and reviewed more than 700 rezoning applications.
In the above sentence "Former chair of the planning board for 18 consecutive years and a board member for 28 years" is acting as a modifier.
So the structure is Modifier, Independent clause.
I do not see an issue here as well. Please help me understand why this is incorrect.
Also, I want to understand what is the difference between Option B and C. Whether the article "the" is necessary, and if yes, why?
14 Oct 2021, 03:06
Kudos
Bookmarks
This was a tricky one for me.
The way that I understand it is as follows: the author is trying to tell us about all the things that Joan did when she was the chair.
B) would be correct if it read "The former chair of the planning board, Joan Philkill, . . . . "
C) would be grammatically correct as you say, (Modifier + Independent Clause) but is the aim to tell us about the former chair or is the aim to tell us about Joan? If the author is trying to tell us about Joan as I mentioned above, then she attended all those meetings when she was chair.
To answer your question on whether the article is necessary or not, if it came down to the two options, I would go with C on the basis of efficiency and conciseness.
Keen to hear any other opinions or thoughts.
The way that I understand it is as follows: the author is trying to tell us about all the things that Joan did when she was the chair.
B) would be correct if it read "The former chair of the planning board, Joan Philkill, . . . . "
C) would be grammatically correct as you say, (Modifier + Independent Clause) but is the aim to tell us about the former chair or is the aim to tell us about Joan? If the author is trying to tell us about Joan as I mentioned above, then she attended all those meetings when she was chair.
To answer your question on whether the article is necessary or not, if it came down to the two options, I would go with C on the basis of efficiency and conciseness.
Keen to hear any other opinions or thoughts.
