Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Nov 2007:30 AM PST
-08:30 AM PST
Learn what truly sets the UC Riverside MBA apart and how it helps in your professional growth
Nov 2211:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment- Nov 23
11:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Attend this free GMAT Algebra Webinar and learn how to master the most challenging Inequalities and Absolute Value problems with ease. 
Nov 2510:00 AM EST
-11:00 AM EST
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
04 Jul 2020, 09:19
Kudos
Bookmarks
Why is statement 2 insufficient ? If there is no information about smokers can't we simply assume that ONLY grillers were sold ? Even if we consider cases in which the ratio of griller:smoker was 3:4 the new ratio always comes out to be 1:2. Here is how
CASE 1 Grill:Smoke = 30:40. After the sales of 1/3 grillers the new ratio is 20:40= 1:2
CASE 2 Grill:Smoke = 60:80. After the sales of 1/3 grillers the new ratio is 40:80 = 1:2
CASE 3 Grill:Smoke = 90:120. Again the new ratio is 1:2.
So what is the problem ?
Experts please help chetan2u Bunuel GMATNinja VeritasKarishma ManhattanPrep nick1816 egmat
CASE 1 Grill:Smoke = 30:40. After the sales of 1/3 grillers the new ratio is 20:40= 1:2
CASE 2 Grill:Smoke = 60:80. After the sales of 1/3 grillers the new ratio is 40:80 = 1:2
CASE 3 Grill:Smoke = 90:120. Again the new ratio is 1:2.
So what is the problem ?
Experts please help chetan2u Bunuel GMATNinja VeritasKarishma ManhattanPrep nick1816 egmat
07 Jul 2020, 00:29
Kudos
Bookmarks
TaizKaran
Statement 2 gives you info about how many grillers were sold. It doesn't tell you that no smokers were sold. So you cannot assume that.
If there were 3 grillers and 4 smokers and 1 griller and 2 smokers were sold, you would be left with a ratio of 1:1.
Stmnt 2 alone is not sufficient.
16 Sep 2025, 22:45
Kudos
Bookmarks
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!
Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).
Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).
Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
