Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
For most test takers, Data Insights is the most challenging section on the GMAT, with test takers scoring several points lower on average on DI than on Quant or Verbal and completing the section with less time to spare.
In Episode 7 of our GMAT Ninja CR series, we are rounding up the oddballs, the misfits, and the format-benders: EXCEPT, Fill-In-The-Blanks, and other unusual Critical Reasoning question types. When you see a question that ends with a literal blank line
Register for the GMAT Club Virtual MBA Spotlight Fair – the world’s premier event for serious MBA candidates. This is your chance to hear directly from Admissions Directors at nearly every Top 30 MBA program..
1. Australian embryologists have found evidence that suggests that the elephant is descended from an aquatic animal, and its trunk originally evolved as a kind of snorkel. 2. Australian embryologists have found evidence to suggest that the elephant is descended from an aquatic animal and that its trunk originally evolved as a kind of snorkel.
what is the diff. between these two sentence. kindly explain.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
I'm no verbal expert, but I noticed a couple of differences that should help.
1. "evidence to suggest" is not idiomatically correct 2. "evidence that suggests" should be correct 3. "and its trunk originally evolved as a kind of snorkel" in the first sentence seems to be an independent clause, and we have to put a comma before it
Can anyone confirm/add to this? Am I wrong somewhere?
I'm no verbal expert, but I noticed a couple of differences that should help.
1. "evidence to suggest" is not idiomatically correct 2. "evidence that suggests" should be correct 3. "and its trunk originally evolved as a kind of snorkel" in the first sentence seems to be an independent clause, and we have to put a comma before it
Can anyone confirm/add to this? Am I wrong somewhere?
Show more
1) "Evidence to" is OK idiom 2) "Evidence that" is OK idiom 3) First sentence is not parallel second sentence : that the elephant ........animal and that its trunk......... snorkel. 4) And evidence suggests two facts : elephant is descended from an aquatic animal and its trunk originally evolved as a kind of snorkel, So we need to make the both the clause parallel.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.