GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 11 Dec 2018, 10:37

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel
Events & Promotions in December
PrevNext
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
2526272829301
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
303112345
Open Detailed Calendar
  • Free GMAT Prep Hour

     December 11, 2018

     December 11, 2018

     09:00 PM EST

     10:00 PM EST

    Strategies and techniques for approaching featured GMAT topics. December 11 at 9 PM EST.
  • The winning strategy for 700+ on the GMAT

     December 13, 2018

     December 13, 2018

     08:00 AM PST

     09:00 AM PST

    What people who reach the high 700's do differently? We're going to share insights, tips and strategies from data we collected on over 50,000 students who used examPAL.

AWA - “Professor Taylor of Jones University is promoting a model of fo

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
Manager
Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 24 Dec 2017
Posts: 172
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Real Estate
Schools: Johnson '21
AWA - “Professor Taylor of Jones University is promoting a model of fo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Feb 2018, 01:25
The following appeared in an article in a college departmental newsletter:

“Professor Taylor of Jones University is promoting a model of foreign language instruction in which students receive 10 weeks of intensive training, then go abroad to live with families for 10 weeks. The superiority of the model, Professor Taylor contends, is proved by the results of a study in which foreign language tests given to students at 25 other colleges show that first-year foreign language students at Jones speak more fluently after only 10 to 20 weeks in the program than do nine out of 10 foreign language majors elsewhere at the time of their graduation.”

The article states that Professor Taylor at Jones University is promoting a model of foreign language instruction where students will spend 10 weeks of intensive training and go abroad and live with families for 10 weeks. This methodology of teaching has shown better results than any other colleges however the article is unconvincing and the argument is built on weak assumptions. Although the article looks affirmative, author has failed to provide substantial information to support his position.

Firstly, argument suggests that Jones University is providing a model of foreign language instruction where students are given intensive 10 weeks training before sending them abroad to live with families in order to work on that language on a daily basis. Author has failed to consider certain factors that make a course or major superior to others. For example, ten weeks intensive training might be sufficient for a student who is good at grasping the language quickly but on the other hand this is not an effective program for students who are weak in picking up languages. Therefore argument should provide comparison on various foreign language-teaching models available in the city and highlight the significance of this teaching model.

Secondly, author claims that students who had undergone this training method picked up the language much faster compared to others however the claim is flawed because it relies only on a test score. A test score cannot decide the proficiency of a student while speaking especially when the objective is to become fluent in speaking and not to excel at writing that language. Besides that, argument does not provide any evidence of test results that would help to at least to make a comparison. Absence of these factors makes the argument vague and incomplete.

Thirdly, based on the thread of the argument, it is understood that the program is having a different structure from the rest like sending students abroad and minimized classroom coaching. Due to these changes in structure, it’s highly possible that tuition fees and related academic fees will be comparatively higher and this would adversely affect to attract students who are budget focused.

To conclude, the argument is not logical and author did not provide supportive evidences to prove his position. In order to make the argument valid, all the above-mentioned points should be considered to support his premise.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
P
Joined: 13 Oct 2016
Posts: 286
Concentration: Operations, Leadership
GMAT 1: 600 Q44 V28
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: AWA - “Professor Taylor of Jones University is promoting a model of fo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Feb 2018, 09:17
ArjunJag1328 wrote:
The following appeared in an article in a college departmental newsletter:

“Professor Taylor of Jones University is promoting a model of foreign language instruction in which students receive 10 weeks of intensive training, then go abroad to live with families for 10 weeks. The superiority of the model, Professor Taylor contends, is proved by the results of a study in which foreign language tests given to students at 25 other colleges show that first-year foreign language students at Jones speak more fluently after only 10 to 20 weeks in the program than do nine out of 10 foreign language majors elsewhere at the time of their graduation.”

The article states that Professor Taylor at Jones University is promoting a model of foreign language instruction where students will spend 10 weeks of intensive training and go abroad and live with families for 10 weeks. This methodology of teaching has shown better results than any other colleges however the article is unconvincing and the argument is built on weak assumptions. Although the article looks affirmative, author has failed to provide substantial information to support his position.

Firstly, argument suggests that Jones University is providing a model of foreign language instruction where students are given intensive 10 weeks training before sending them abroad to live with families in order to work on that language on a daily basis. Author has failed to consider certain factors that make a course or major superior to others. For example, ten weeks intensive training might be sufficient for a student who is good at grasping the language quickly but on the other hand this is not an effective program for students who are weak in picking up languages. Therefore argument should provide comparison on various foreign language-teaching models available in the city and highlight the significance of this teaching model.

Secondly, author claims that students who had undergone this training method picked up the language much faster compared to others however the claim is flawed because it relies only on a test score. A test score cannot decide the proficiency of a student while speaking especially when the objective is to become fluent in speaking and not to excel at writing that language. Besides that, argument does not provide any evidence of test results that would help to at least to make a comparison. Absence of these factors makes the argument vague and incomplete.

Thirdly, based on the thread of the argument, it is understood that the program is having a different structure from the rest like sending students abroad and minimized classroom coaching. Due to these changes in structure, it’s highly possible that tuition fees and related academic fees will be comparatively higher and this would adversely affect to attract students who are budget focused.

To conclude, the argument is not logical and author did not provide supportive evidences to prove his position. In order to make the argument valid, all the above-mentioned points should be considered to support his premise.


Hi ArjunJag1328

Please find below the link which contains almost all the essays related to the GMAT exam (you might find similar essays like the one posted by you as well). These essays will guarantee you a score of 5-6 in the AWA section of the GMAT Exam.

https://gmatclub.com/forum/awa-compilations-109-analysis-of-argument-essays-86274.html
For any further queries please do get back to me. All the best for your exam preparation :)
_________________

_______________________________________________
If you appreciate the post then please click +1Kudos :)

GMAT Club Bot
Re: AWA - “Professor Taylor of Jones University is promoting a model of fo &nbs [#permalink] 21 Feb 2018, 09:17
Display posts from previous: Sort by

AWA - “Professor Taylor of Jones University is promoting a model of fo

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.