Last visit was: 23 Apr 2024, 23:53 It is currently 23 Apr 2024, 23:53

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 03 Jul 2007
Posts: 34
Own Kudos [?]: 5 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 08 Jun 2007
Posts: 285
Own Kudos [?]: 317 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 03 Jul 2007
Posts: 34
Own Kudos [?]: 5 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 20 Jun 2007
Posts: 60
Own Kudos [?]: 69 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
 Q46  V48
Send PM
Re: AWA review [#permalink]
I think there are two types of AWA - analysis of an issue and analysis of an argument. If there's a problem with your piece, it may be that it is more an analysis of the issue, rather than an analysis of the argument.

For me, the key part of the argument can be summarised as "medical technology is getting better, therefore life expectancy will continue to improve". If we want to analyse the argument we need to identify its weaknesses. The main weakness is an assumption that medical technology is the only driver of life expectancy. This is not true. You have identified two alternative drivers of life expectancy a) availability of medical technology b) pollution. It would be worth including other possible drivers of life expectancy - poor diet and sedentary lifestyles may be good examples.

"You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion. "

I don't think your piece specifically addressed any of these prompts - but you could probably suggest the inclusion of statistical analysis etc. Whatever information you have to hand may be less relevant than showing a willingness to challenge the argument that has been presented.
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 03 Jul 2007
Posts: 34
Own Kudos [?]: 5 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: AWA review [#permalink]
Great comments. I'll try to get better based on your recommendations.

Thanks a bunch!!

Regards



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
GMAT Club Bot
Re: AWA review [#permalink]
Moderators:
Retired Moderator
654 posts
Current Student
733 posts
Current Student
278 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne