Quote:
Because the native salmon in Lake Clearwater had nearly disappeared, sockeye salmon were introduced in 1940. After being introduced, this genetically uniform group of sockeyes split into two distinct populations that do not interbreed, one inhabiting deep areas of the lake and the other inhabiting shallow areas. Since the two populations now different genetically, some researchers hypothesize that each has adapted genetically to its distinct habitat.
Conclusion : Distinct Habitat ---> 2 Genetically diff. species (Casual Passage)
Pre-Thinking :
Assumption : As it is a casual passage, All the generic assumptions to a casual passage such as Cause happed before effect, Cause is the only reason for effect ,etc can be applied.
Here, Distinct Habitat should be the only reason for the origination of these genetic species.
Which of the following, if true,
most strongly supports the researchers' hypothesis?(A) Neither of the two populations of sockeyes has interbred with the native salmon
In line with our pre-thinking, If this is negated it will shatter the conclusion.
Negation: At least one of the sockeyes interbred with the native salmon.
So this is the reason for the origination of these genetic species, not the habitat. Hence this is an assumption. (B) When the native salmon in Lake Clearwater were numerous, they comprised two distinct populations that did not interbreed
Irrelvant(C) Most types of salmon that inhabit lakes spend part of the time in shallow water and part in deeper water
Weakens the conclusion(D) One of the populations of sockeyes is virtually identical genetically to the sockeyes originally introduced in 1940
OFS(E) The total number of sockeye salmon in the lake is not as large as the number of native salmon had been many years ago
OFS,Irrelvant