Bunuel
Before the advent of writing each of the isolated clans of the Comaquogue tribe had master storytellers whose function was to orally transmit the clan's tradition from one generation to the next. When writing was developed within certain clans of the tribe, their master storytellers disappeared within a few generations. This stands to reason, since the availability of written records obviated the need for masterful oral communicators to keep the tradition of literate clans alive. What has puzzled anthropologists, however, is the total lack of masterful storytellers in modern illiterate Comaquogue clans.
Which of the following, if true, best helps to explain the puzzling situation mentioned above?
(A) Modern illiterate Comaquogue clan members display personality characteristics that resemble their ancestors more closely than they resemble the characteristics of modern literate Comaquogue clan members.
(B) Modern illiterate Comaquogue clans participate in more ritual gatherings than most modern literate Comaquogue clans do, but they participate in fewer ritual gatherings than did their common ancestors.
(C) Modern illiterate Comaquogue clans are recently descended from long-time literate clans that failed to pass on the skills of reading and writing due to a devastating 75-year war.
(D) The celebrations of modern illiterate Comaquogue clans involve a great deal of singing and dancing, and children are taught clan songs and dances from a very young age.
(E) The traditions of modern illiterate Comaquogue clans are an amalgamation of the cumulative experiences of previous generations plus innovations to the heritage added by the current generation of clan members.
Before writing was developed, ALL clans had story tellers. So everyone had storytellers. After writing developed in some clans, their storytellers disappeared (because they were not needed anymore). It stands to reason then that clans that remained illiterate kept the storyteller tradition alive.
Paradox - The modern illiterate clans do not have storytellers.
This is a paradox because we understand why story tellers disappeared from literate clans (clans in which people could write). They were not needed anymore. But illiterate clans must have needed story tellers. Why are there none today?
(A) Modern illiterate Comaquogue clan members display personality characteristics that resemble their ancestors more closely than they resemble the characteristics of modern literate Comaquogue clan members.
Out of scope. Where are the storytellers?
(B) Modern illiterate Comaquogue clans participate in more ritual gatherings than most modern literate Comaquogue clans do, but they participate in fewer ritual gatherings than did their common ancestors.
Number of ritual gatherings is irrelevant. WHO transmits the clan's tradition from one generation to the next?
(C) Modern illiterate Comaquogue clans are recently descended from long-time literate clans that failed to pass on the skills of reading and writing due to a devastating 75-year war.
This makes sense. The current illiterate clans were once literate. So their storytellers disappeared, as expected. The current generation couldn't learn reading and writing because of war. So they have no storytellers now and are not literate too now.
(D) The celebrations of modern illiterate Comaquogue clans involve a great deal of singing and dancing, and children are taught clan songs and dances from a very young age.
Again out of scope. The point is why there are no storytellers. Singing and dancing would not make storytellers disappear.
(E) The traditions of modern illiterate Comaquogue clans are an amalgamation of the cumulative experiences of previous generations plus innovations to the heritage added by the current generation of clan members.
Irrelevant.
Answer (C)