GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 16 Oct 2019, 12:37

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Between 1984 and 1989, occupancy rates in college

Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Joined: 27 Jun 2012
Posts: 350
Concentration: Strategy, Finance
Schools: Haas EWMBA '17
Between 1984 and 1989, occupancy rates in college  [#permalink]

Show Tags

07 Jan 2013, 20:59
4
9
00:00

Difficulty:

75% (hard)

Question Stats:

54% (01:52) correct 46% (02:20) wrong based on 600 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Between 1984 and 1989, occupancy rates in college dormitories averaged 91 percent of capacity, while admission rates remained constant at an average of 200 students per 1,000 rooms per year. Between 1989 and 1994, however, occupancy rates rose to an average of 98 percent of capacity, while student admission rates declined to 150 per 1,000 rooms per year.

If the information above is true, it would most clearly support which of the following statements?
(A) The average length of time that students remained in campus housing increased between 1989 and 1994.
(B) The proportion of students living in campus housing was greater in 1994 than in 1989.
(C) Student admission rates tend to decline whenever campus-housing occupancy rates rise.
(D) Campus dormitories built prior to 1989 generally had fewer rooms than did campus dormitories built after 1989.
(E) The more rooms campus housing has, the higher its occupancy rate is likely to be.

_________________
Thanks,
Prashant Ponde

Tough 700+ Level RCs: Passage1 | Passage2 | Passage3 | Passage4 | Passage5 | Passage6 | Passage7
VOTE GMAT Practice Tests: Vote Here
PowerScore CR Bible - Official Guide 13 Questions Set Mapped: Click here
Senior Manager
Joined: 27 Jun 2012
Posts: 350
Concentration: Strategy, Finance
Schools: Haas EWMBA '17
Re: Between 1984 and 1989, occupancy rates in college dormitorie  [#permalink]

Show Tags

07 Jan 2013, 23:36
7
The stimulus offers facts about the occupancy rates in college dormitories for two time periods – 1984-1989 and 1989-1994. The more recent time period had an increase in occupancy rates at the same time fewer students were admitted. Here, a strong connection between the two statements allows us to predict that the increase in occupancy rates during 1989-1994 must be caused by more current students remaining in the dormitories. The increase in occupancy rates cannot be caused by more new students because there were fewer students admitted.

Choice (A) states that the average length of time that students remained in campus housing increased between 1989 and 1994. This matches with above explanation and is the correct answer.

Choice (B) says that the proportion of students living in campus housing was greater in 1994 than in 1989. This is an irrelevant comparison; we are concerned with the percentage of rooms that are occupied, not the percentage of students who live in dormitories.

Choice (C) mentions that student admission rates tend to decline whenever campus-housing occupancy rates rise. This is outside of the scope; we can’t infer anything about how admission and occupancy rates typically behave from this specific example.

Choice (D) indicates that campus dormitories built prior to 1989 generally had fewer rooms than did campus dormitories built after 1989. This makes an irrelevant comparison – the number of rooms is not an issue, as the stimulus gives us the information as a “"per 1,000”" rate.

Choice (E) suggests that the more rooms campus housing has, the higher its occupancy rate is likely to be. This doesn't follow from the stimulus – again, the rate of occupancy makes the actual number of rooms irrelevant.
_________________
Thanks,
Prashant Ponde

Tough 700+ Level RCs: Passage1 | Passage2 | Passage3 | Passage4 | Passage5 | Passage6 | Passage7
VOTE GMAT Practice Tests: Vote Here
PowerScore CR Bible - Official Guide 13 Questions Set Mapped: Click here
General Discussion
Intern
Joined: 02 Oct 2010
Posts: 11
Re: Between 1984 and 1989, occupancy rates in college dormitorie  [#permalink]

Show Tags

07 Jan 2013, 22:14
I have chosen B. I would appreciate if you can provide explanation.
Intern
Joined: 05 Jan 2011
Posts: 47
Re: Between 1984 and 1989, occupancy rates in college dormitorie  [#permalink]

Show Tags

08 Jan 2013, 21:11
Although I chose correct answer ,but have a tough time in interpreting choice -A ,especially occupancy rate & admission rate

Please someone explain a bit more on OA

Thanks
Bijay
Intern
Joined: 13 Oct 2012
Posts: 39
Schools: IE '15 (A)
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V46
Re: Between 1984 and 1989, occupancy rates in college dormitorie  [#permalink]

Show Tags

08 Jan 2013, 21:52
1
1
occupancy rate is the percentage of rooms that remain occupied in a particular time period.
even though number of students admitted decreased, their stay at the dormitory increased hence the occupancy rate increased.
Intern
Joined: 14 Apr 2012
Posts: 1
Re: Between 1984 and 1989, occupancy rates in college dormitorie  [#permalink]

Show Tags

03 Sep 2013, 21:55
rohantiwari wrote:
occupancy rate is the percentage of rooms that remain occupied in a particular time period.
even though number of students admitted decreased, their stay at the dormitory increased hence the occupancy rate increased.

I do not agree: the number of admitted students does not necessarely decrease, only the rate does. Very confusing question...

Posted from GMAT ToolKit
Manager
Status: Persevering
Joined: 15 May 2013
Posts: 146
Location: India
GMAT Date: 08-02-2013
GPA: 3.7
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
Re: Between 1984 and 1989, occupancy rates in college dormitorie  [#permalink]

Show Tags

06 Sep 2013, 10:16
Belerofonte wrote:
rohantiwari wrote:
occupancy rate is the percentage of rooms that remain occupied in a particular time period.
even though number of students admitted decreased, their stay at the dormitory increased hence the occupancy rate increased.

I do not agree: the number of admitted students does not necessarely decrease, only the rate does. Very confusing question...

Posted from GMAT ToolKit

A ,Correct, the number of new students decrease, so the average stay of the other students must increase to have a higher occupancy rate.
B, Incorrect as we are given the average 98 percent, we cannot be sure that the number of students were more in 1994 or 1989. We cannot conclude this from the information provided.
Rest all are way off.
_________________
--It's one thing to get defeated, but another to accept it.
Director
Joined: 17 Dec 2012
Posts: 626
Location: India
Re: Between 1984 and 1989, occupancy rates in college dormitorie  [#permalink]

Show Tags

07 Sep 2013, 01:21
1
Belerofonte wrote:
rohantiwari wrote:
occupancy rate is the percentage of rooms that remain occupied in a particular time period.
even though number of students admitted decreased, their stay at the dormitory increased hence the occupancy rate increased.

I do not agree: the number of admitted students does not necessarely decrease, only the rate does. Very confusing question...

Posted from GMAT ToolKit

Hi,

Assume:

In 1989: No.of rooms =1000, New students = 200, Rooms occupied= 910, Old students = 710
In 1994: No.of rooms = 2000, New students = 300, Rooms occupied= 1960 Old students = 1660

The greater proportion of old students to new students in 1994 would result in increased average stay period of the students in 1994.
_________________
Srinivasan Vaidyaraman
Sravna Test Prep
http://www.sravnatestprep.com

Holistic and Systematic Approach
Intern
Joined: 03 Jul 2013
Posts: 23
Re: Between 1984 and 1989, occupancy rates in college  [#permalink]

Show Tags

20 Nov 2013, 11:38
I missed the meaning of occupancy rate - hence messed up my answer choice
Manager
Joined: 28 Apr 2013
Posts: 118
Location: India
GPA: 4
WE: Medicine and Health (Health Care)
Re: Between 1984 and 1989, occupancy rates in college  [#permalink]

Show Tags

21 Nov 2013, 20:10
PraPon wrote:
Between 1984 and 1989, occupancy rates in college dormitories averaged 91 percent of capacity, while admission rates remained constant at an average of 200 students per 1,000 rooms per year. Between 1989 and 1994, however, occupancy rates rose to an average of 98 percent of capacity, while student admission rates declined to 150 per 1,000 rooms per year.

If the information above is true, it would most clearly support which of the following statements?
(A) The average length of time that students remained in campus housing increased between 1989 and 1994.
(B) The proportion of students living in campus housing was greater in 1994 than in 1989.
(C) Student admission rates tend to decline whenever campus-housing occupancy rates rise.
(D) Campus dormitories built prior to 1989 generally had fewer rooms than did campus dormitories built after 1989.
(E) The more rooms campus housing has, the higher its occupancy rate is likely to be.

Good one ;
Passage- said That OR-91 when AR-Constant; OR-98 when AR- Decresed.

(A) The average length of time that students remained in campus housing increased between 1989 and 1994. - Correctly defies the ; if the average time the student spending in campus increases then the rooms are likely to occupied at single point of tie hence the occupancy rate will go up, irrespective of the Admission rate.

(B) The proportion of students living in campus housing was greater in 1994 than in 1989.- Now here the word proportion of students is used which mean the ratio of no. of students; i guess OR - defined by no. of rooms occupied /total no. of rooms, not by total no. of students. So this is also not true.

(C) Student admission rates tend to decline whenever campus-housing occupancy rates rise. - So this fact already mentioned in the passage, need not to repeat, this is a fact.

(D) Campus dormitories built prior to 1989 generally had fewer rooms than did campus dormitories built after 1989- May be the case but increased rooms does not correlate with increased occupancy and decreased AR.

(E) The more rooms campus housing has, the higher its occupancy rate is likely to be. - passage discusses the relation v\between OR and AR not with no. of rooms.

_________________
Thanks for Posting

LEARN TO ANALYSE

+1 kudos if you like
Director
Joined: 23 Jan 2013
Posts: 525
Schools: Cambridge'16
Re: Between 1984 and 1989, occupancy rates in college  [#permalink]

Show Tags

16 Jul 2015, 23:29
Prephrasing: If admission rate goes down but occupancy goes up the reason can be that admmitted students study more time

A
Retired Moderator
Joined: 06 Jul 2014
Posts: 1220
Location: Ukraine
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Technology
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V33
GMAT 2: 740 Q50 V40
Re: Between 1984 and 1989, occupancy rates in college  [#permalink]

Show Tags

17 Jul 2015, 06:31
Temurkhon wrote:
Prephrasing: If admission rate goes down but occupancy goes up the reason can be that admmitted students study more time

A

If we use the same logic for variant B:
If admission rate goes down but occupancy goes up the reason can be that admmitted students start living in the campus and not outside campus.

---- Another explanation:
In 1989: No.of rooms =1000, New students = 200, Rooms occupied= 910, Old students = 710
In 1994: No.of rooms = 2000, New students = 300, Rooms occupied= 1960 Old students = 1660

The greater proportion of old students to new students in 1994 would result in increased average stay period of the students in 1994.

The same logic for B

In 1989: No.of rooms =1000, New students = 200, Rooms occupied= 910, students live not in campus: 90
In 1994: No.of rooms = 2000, New students = 300, Rooms occupied= 1960, students live not in campus: 40
The greater proportion of students living in campus to students living not in campus in 1994 would result in increased number of students live in campus

====

If we can infer that student start living in campus more time why we can't infer that they stop living outside the campus and as a result occupancy rate increase?

Am I miss something obvious?
_________________
Intern
Joined: 03 Dec 2016
Posts: 1
Re: Between 1984 and 1989, occupancy rates in college  [#permalink]

Show Tags

01 Jan 2017, 09:04
Harley1980 wrote:

If we can infer that student start living in campus more time why we can't infer that they stop living outside the campus and as a result occupancy rate increase?

Am I miss something obvious?

I dropped B because the stimulus compares 84-89 with 89-94 (periods) while the answer option compares 89 with 94 (specific years).
Manager
Joined: 29 Oct 2016
Posts: 205
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 620 Q50 V24
GRE 1: Q167 V147
Re: Between 1984 and 1989, occupancy rates in college  [#permalink]

Show Tags

03 Apr 2017, 09:02
Hi experts,
Can you please elaborate more on option A and B?

Thanks
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Status: GMAT and GRE tutor
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 2857
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Between 1984 and 1989, occupancy rates in college  [#permalink]

Show Tags

03 Apr 2017, 10:15
Top Contributor
1
This is basically a "resolve the paradox" question. We're trying to figure out how it's possible that the following are both true:

occupancy rates are up
BUT student admission rates are down, at least relative to the number of available rooms

As others have explained here, (A) makes sense: if students spend more time, on average, living in campus housing, then that would explain why occupancy rates are up, even if admissions rates are down.

But what's the problem with (B)? Well, it leaves a subtle loophole: "proportion of students" isn't necessarily the same thing as "proportion of admitted students." For example, you could have a greater proportion of students living in campus housing, but if tons had dropped out -- or had decided not to attend after being admitted -- then it still wouldn't resolve the paradox. (B) simply doesn't cleanly connect admitted students to actual occupancy in student housing.

Of course, usual disclaimers apply here about non-official questions, so don't lose much sleep over this one, either.

(Note: this has been edited from the original version since I made a dumb typo.)
_________________
GMAT/GRE tutor @ www.gmatninja.com (we're hiring!) | GMAT Club Verbal Expert | Instagram | Blog | Bad at PMs

Beginners' guides to GMAT verbal: RC | CR | SC

YouTube LIVE verbal webinars: Series 1: Fundamentals of SC & CR | Series 2: Developing a Winning GMAT Mindset

SC articles & resources: How to go from great (760) to incredible (780) on GMAT SC | That "-ing" Word Probably Isn't a Verb | That "-ed" Word Might Not Be a Verb, Either | No-BS Guide to GMAT Idioms | "Being" is not the enemy | WTF is "that" doing in my sentence?

RC, CR, and other articles & resources: All GMAT Ninja articles on GMAT Club | Using LSAT for GMAT CR & RC |7 reasons why your actual GMAT scores don't match your practice test scores | How to get 4 additional "fake" GMAT Prep tests for \$29.99 | Time management on verbal

SC & CR Questions of the Day (QOTDs), featuring expert explanations: All QOTDs | Subscribe via email | RSS

Need an expert reply? Hit the request verbal experts' reply button; be specific about your question, and tag @GMATNinja. Priority is always given to official GMAT questions.
Manager
Status: Active
Affiliations: NA
Joined: 24 Oct 2012
Posts: 237
GMAT 1: 590 Q50 V21
GMAT 2: 600 Q48 V25
GMAT 3: 730 Q51 V37
GPA: 3.5
Re: Between 1984 and 1989, occupancy rates in college  [#permalink]

Show Tags

06 Apr 2017, 23:18
1
GMATNinja wrote:
This is basically a "resolve the paradox" question. We're trying to figure out how it's possible that the following are both true:

occupancy rates are up
BUT student admission rates are down, at least relative to the number of available rooms

As others have explained here, (A) makes sense: if students spend more time, on average, living in campus housing, then that would explain why occupancy rates are down, even if admissions rates are not.

But what's the problem with (B)? Well, it leaves a subtle loophole: "proportion of students" isn't necessarily the same thing as "proportion of admitted students." For example, you could have a greater proportion of students living in campus housing, but if tons had dropped out -- or had decided not to attend after being admitted -- then it still wouldn't resolve the paradox. (B) simply doesn't cleanly connect admitted students to actual occupancy in student housing.

Of course, usual disclaimers apply here about non-official questions, so don't lose much sleep over this one, either.

Hi,
In line
(A) makes sense: if students spend more time, on average, living in campus housing, then that would explain why occupancy rates are down, even if admissions rates are not.

Did you mean occupancy rates are going up?
_________________
#If you like my post , please encourage me by giving Kudos
Intern
Joined: 09 Sep 2016
Posts: 26
Re: Between 1984 and 1989, occupancy rates in college  [#permalink]

Show Tags

07 Apr 2017, 00:44
vishu1414 wrote:
Although I chose correct answer ,but have a tough time in interpreting choice -A ,especially occupancy rate & admission rate

Please someone explain a bit more on OA

Thanks
Bijay

I think A is wrong. What if the number of rooms increased
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Status: GMAT and GRE tutor
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 2857
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Re: Between 1984 and 1989, occupancy rates in college  [#permalink]

Show Tags

10 Apr 2017, 14:59
Top Contributor
Thank you for catching my error, Anje29! Yes, I meant to say that occupancy rates are down. Edited my post so that it doesn't confuse anybody else.
_________________
GMAT/GRE tutor @ www.gmatninja.com (we're hiring!) | GMAT Club Verbal Expert | Instagram | Blog | Bad at PMs

Beginners' guides to GMAT verbal: RC | CR | SC

YouTube LIVE verbal webinars: Series 1: Fundamentals of SC & CR | Series 2: Developing a Winning GMAT Mindset

SC articles & resources: How to go from great (760) to incredible (780) on GMAT SC | That "-ing" Word Probably Isn't a Verb | That "-ed" Word Might Not Be a Verb, Either | No-BS Guide to GMAT Idioms | "Being" is not the enemy | WTF is "that" doing in my sentence?

RC, CR, and other articles & resources: All GMAT Ninja articles on GMAT Club | Using LSAT for GMAT CR & RC |7 reasons why your actual GMAT scores don't match your practice test scores | How to get 4 additional "fake" GMAT Prep tests for \$29.99 | Time management on verbal

SC & CR Questions of the Day (QOTDs), featuring expert explanations: All QOTDs | Subscribe via email | RSS

Need an expert reply? Hit the request verbal experts' reply button; be specific about your question, and tag @GMATNinja. Priority is always given to official GMAT questions.
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 5916
Re: Between 1984 and 1989, occupancy rates in college  [#permalink]

Show Tags

13 Apr 2019, 09:14
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________
Re: Between 1984 and 1989, occupancy rates in college   [#permalink] 13 Apr 2019, 09:14
Display posts from previous: Sort by