GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 18 Oct 2019, 01:44

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Between 1995 and 2000, the minimum wage in

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Find Similar Topics 
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 10 Apr 2012
Posts: 262
Location: United States
Concentration: Technology, Other
GPA: 2.44
WE: Project Management (Telecommunications)
GMAT ToolKit User
Between 1995 and 2000, the minimum wage in  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Oct 2013, 16:17
2
4
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  45% (medium)

Question Stats:

68% (01:40) correct 32% (01:41) wrong based on 310 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Which of the following most logically completes the passage?

Between 1995 and 2000, the minimum wage in Laconia increased by 15 percent. However, even though all Laconian minimum-wage workers were subject to the increase, and inflation during this period was less than 3 percent, most Laconians who worked for minimum wage during this period were no more comfortable in 2000 than they were in 1995, primarily because_______.


(A)between 1995 and 2000 the number of Laconians working for minimum wage had been constantly increasing.

(B)during this time, most Laconian minimum-wage workers had no other source of income.

(C)between 1995 and 2000, most products consumed by Laconians working for minimum wage increased in price by 5 percent.

(D)Laconian minimum-wage workers did not have to pay any property or income taxes in 1995, a situation which had changed by 2000.

(E)most elderly people in Laconia received insignificant benefit, which was not sufficient to make a living, and their children who often worked for minimum wage had to support them financially.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 23 May 2013
Posts: 93
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Between 1995 and 2000, the minimum wage in  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Oct 2013, 21:44
2
guerrero25 wrote:
Which of the following most logically completes the passage?

Between 1995 and 2000, the minimum wage in Laconia increased by 15 percent. However, even though all Laconian minimum-wage workers were subject to the increase, and inflation during this period was less than 3 percent, most Laconians who worked for minimum wage during this period were no more comfortable in 2000 than they were in 1995, primarily because_______.


(A)between 1995 and 2000 the number of Laconians working for minimum wage had been constantly increasing.

(B)during this time, most Laconian minimum-wage workers had no other source of income.

(C)between 1995 and 2000, most products consumed by Laconians working for minimum wage increased in price by 5 percent.

(D)Laconian minimum-wage workers did not have to pay any property or income taxes in 1995, a situation which had changed by 2000.

(E)most elderly people in Laconia received insignificant benefit, which was not sufficient to make a living, and their children who often worked for minimum wage had to support them financially.


A- does not matter. Even though the number of workers were increasing, each recd the min pay. the pay didnt go down due to this fact.
B - does not matter. whether they had any additional source does not matter, since we dont know in 1995 if they had any additional source which made them comfy
C - this could be the answer..but would not cause significant discomfort, since their wage inc was 15%.
D - Yes..taxes came into effect and they could reduce the net take home pay
E - We dont know how many workers had dependent parents and if the scenario is applicable to most of them - note most elderly were dependent does not mean most wage workers had dependents.
_________________
“Confidence comes not from always being right but from not fearing to be wrong.”
Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: Persevering
Joined: 15 May 2013
Posts: 146
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Leadership
GMAT Date: 08-02-2013
GPA: 3.7
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Between 1995 and 2000, the minimum wage in  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Oct 2013, 10:09
Between 1995 and 2000, the minimum wage in Laconia increased by 15 percent. However, even though all Laconian minimum-wage workers were subject to the increase, and inflation during this period was less than 3 percent, most Laconians who worked for minimum wage during this period were no more comfortable in 2000 than they were in 1995, primarily because_______.


(A)between 1995 and 2000 the number of Laconians working for minimum wage had been constantly increasing. Does not impact the argument, the argument clearly says that minimum wage increased by 15 percent so it is an average increase, also we are concerned with the existing minimum wage workers, not the new ones

(B)during this time, most Laconian minimum-wage workers had no other source of income. So what does the argument tell us that they had other sources of income earlier ? No

(C)between 1995 and 2000, most products consumed by Laconians working for minimum wage increased in price by 5 percent. Again it is given in the argument that inflation increased by 3 percent, even if we consider this to be the true (which can occur because the inflation was average inflation of a lot of products and this is concerned with the most used products ), It still does not prove how it affects the argument because the income did increase by 15 percent.

(D)Laconian minimum-wage workers did not have to pay any property or income taxes in 1995, a situation which had changed by 2000. This is correct because it shows the contrast between the two period by introducing income and property tax into picture, which did not exist earlier.

(E)most elderly people in Laconia received insignificant benefit, which was not sufficient to make a living, and their children who often worked for minimum wage had to support them financially. Out of scope. where does it say that the benefits were provided earlier but are not provided now
_________________
--It's one thing to get defeated, but another to accept it.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 21 Mar 2014
Posts: 22
Re: Between 1995 and 2000, the minimum wage in  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Sep 2015, 22:24
Although, D seems legit, there is one problem, the statement says, "the situation changed"....
the change might be less than price increase of 5%(option c) ...
justified? , or am i being paranoid....?
_________________
kinaare paaon phailane lage hian,
nadi se roz mitti kat rahi hai....
Board of Directors
User avatar
D
Status: QA & VA Forum Moderator
Joined: 11 Jun 2011
Posts: 4775
Location: India
GPA: 3.5
WE: Business Development (Commercial Banking)
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Between 1995 and 2000, the minimum wage in  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Oct 2018, 11:26
guerrero25 wrote:
Which of the following most logically completes the passage?

Between 1995 and 2000, the minimum wage in Laconia increased by 15 percent. However, even though all Laconian minimum-wage workers were subject to the increase, and inflation during this period was less than 3 percent, most Laconians who worked for minimum wage during this period were no more comfortable in 2000 than they were in 1995, primarily because_______.


(A)between 1995 and 2000 the number of Laconians working for minimum wage had been constantly increasing.

(B)during this time, most Laconian minimum-wage workers had no other source of income.

(C)between 1995 and 2000, most products consumed by Laconians working for minimum wage increased in price by 5 percent.

(D)Laconian minimum-wage workers did not have to pay any property or income taxes in 1995, a situation which had changed by 2000.

(E)most elderly people in Laconia received insignificant benefit, which was not sufficient to make a living, and their children who often worked for minimum wage had to support them financially.


Wages Increased + Inflation (Low) = Workers not happy

The reason may be something such that their expensses (Somewhere) increased considerable, the same has been pointed out in option (D), increase in Property tax will lead to less disposable income, hence correct Answer must be (D).
_________________
Thanks and Regards

Abhishek....

PLEASE FOLLOW THE RULES FOR POSTING IN QA AND VA FORUM AND USE SEARCH FUNCTION BEFORE POSTING NEW QUESTIONS

How to use Search Function in GMAT Club | Rules for Posting in QA forum | Writing Mathematical Formulas |Rules for Posting in VA forum | Request Expert's Reply ( VA Forum Only )
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Between 1995 and 2000, the minimum wage in   [#permalink] 10 Oct 2018, 11:26
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Between 1995 and 2000, the minimum wage in

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  





Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne