Last visit was: 24 Jul 2024, 12:02 It is currently 24 Jul 2024, 12:02
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 25 Jun 2011
Status:Finally Done. Admitted in Kellogg for 2015 intake
Posts: 395
Own Kudos [?]: 17064 [25]
Given Kudos: 217
Location: United Kingdom
Concentration: International Business, Strategy
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V45
GPA: 2.9
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 94608
Own Kudos [?]: 643602 [24]
Given Kudos: 86737
Send PM
General Discussion
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 12 May 2012
Posts: 56
Own Kudos [?]: 244 [0]
Given Kudos: 14
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Operations
GMAT 1: 650 Q51 V25
GMAT 2: 730 Q50 V38
GPA: 4
WE:General Management (Transportation)
Send PM
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 08 Jan 2013
Posts: 11
Own Kudos [?]: 3 [0]
Given Kudos: 1
Send PM
Re: Both Betty and Wilma earn annual salaries of more than $50,000. [#permalink]
I am sorry, but the official answer does not make any sense for Statement 1. It is simply mathematically wrong.

Mathematically spoken the statement says: |Betty-50.000|<|Wilma-50.000| and not Betty-50.000 < Wilma-50.000
Let me make a numerical example. Betty earns 49.999 an Wilma earns 70.000. Obviously Betty's salary is closer than 50.000 though Wilma earns more. And the over way around: Let Betty earn 50.001 and Wilma 40.000, now still Betty's wage is closer to 50.000 though she now earns more than Wilma.

Stating that 1) is sufficient is simply wrong and I'm actually quite astonished people get away with such an answer so easily.

p.s.: The same argumentation holds for 2), so the correct answer must be C, as you can deduct from both statements that both wages must lie above 50.000; something you can't predict earlier.
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 94608
Own Kudos [?]: 643602 [1]
Given Kudos: 86737
Send PM
Re: Both Betty and Wilma earn annual salaries of more than $50,000. [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
ethnix wrote:
I am sorry, but the official answer does not make any sense for Statement 1. It is simply mathematically wrong.

Mathematically spoken the statement says: |Betty-50.000|<|Wilma-50.000| and not Betty-50.000 < Wilma-50.000
Let me make a numerical example. Betty earns 49.999 an Wilma earns 70.000. Obviously Betty's salary is closer than 50.000 though Wilma earns more. And the over way around: Let Betty earn 50.001 and Wilma 40.000, now still Betty's wage is closer to 50.000 though she now earns more than Wilma.

Stating that 1) is sufficient is simply wrong and I'm actually quite astonished people get away with such an answer so easily.

p.s.: The same argumentation holds for 2), so the correct answer must be C, as you can deduct from both statements that both wages must lie above 50.000; something you can't predict earlier.


Welcome to GMAT Club.

Your examples are not correct because we are told that "both Betty and Wilma earn annual salaries of more than $50000".

Hope it's clear.
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 08 Jan 2013
Posts: 11
Own Kudos [?]: 3 [1]
Given Kudos: 1
Send PM
Re: Both Betty and Wilma earn annual salaries of more than $50,000. [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Bunuel wrote:
ethnix wrote:
I am sorry, but the official answer does not make any sense for Statement 1. It is simply mathematically wrong.

Mathematically spoken the statement says: |Betty-50.000|<|Wilma-50.000| and not Betty-50.000 < Wilma-50.000
Let me make a numerical example. Betty earns 49.999 an Wilma earns 70.000. Obviously Betty's salary is closer than 50.000 though Wilma earns more. And the over way around: Let Betty earn 50.001 and Wilma 40.000, now still Betty's wage is closer to 50.000 though she now earns more than Wilma.

Stating that 1) is sufficient is simply wrong and I'm actually quite astonished people get away with such an answer so easily.

p.s.: The same argumentation holds for 2), so the correct answer must be C, as you can deduct from both statements that both wages must lie above 50.000; something you can't predict earlier.


Welcome to GMAT Club.

Your examples are not correct because we are told that "both Betty and Wilma earn annual salaries of more than $50000".

Hope it's clear.



OMG, thanks. I suppose reading the question would avoid to most of my wrong answers :D
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 28 Dec 2013
Posts: 23
Own Kudos [?]: 82 [0]
Given Kudos: 18
Location: United States
GPA: 3
WE:Information Technology (Insurance)
Send PM
Re: Both Betty and Wilma earn annual salaries of more than $50,000. [#permalink]
Hey guys just one small question.

If the test makers intended to say that Betty and Wilma's annual salaries put together was more than 50000 how could they have framed the question. I am non-native speaker so it kinda took me a while to know that they meant Betty > 50000 and Wilma > 50000. Plz help
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 94608
Own Kudos [?]: 643602 [2]
Given Kudos: 86737
Send PM
Re: Both Betty and Wilma earn annual salaries of more than $50,000. [#permalink]
2
Kudos
Expert Reply
janxavier wrote:
Hey guys just one small question.

If the test makers intended to say that Betty and Wilma's annual salaries put together was more than 50000 how could they have framed the question. I am non-native speaker so it kinda took me a while to know that they meant Betty > 50000 and Wilma > 50000. Plz help


It would be something like "combined salary of Betty and Wilma is more than $50000" or "together Betty and Wilma earn annual salary of more than $50000".
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 14 Jun 2015
Posts: 80
Own Kudos [?]: 35 [0]
Given Kudos: 33
Location: India
GMAT 1: 680 Q46 V37
GMAT 2: 750 Q50 V40
GPA: 3.5
WE:Information Technology (Telecommunications)
Send PM
Re: Both Betty and Wilma earn annual salaries of more than $50,000. [#permalink]
Bunuel wrote:
Both Betty and Wilma earn annual salaries of more than $50000. Is Wilma's annual salary greater than Betty's?

Notice that we are told that both Betty and Wilma earn annual salaries of more than $50,000.

(1) Betty's annual salary is closer to $50,000 than is Wilma's.

----$50,000---(Betty)----(Wilma)---- So, as you can see Wilma's annual salary is greater than Betty's. Sufficient.

(2) Betty's annual salary is closer to $35,000 than it is to Wilma's annual salary.

$35,000----$50,000---(Betty)----(Wilma)---- Again Wilma's annual salary is greater than Betty's. Sufficient.

Answer: D.

Hope it's clear.



I got the answer correct, but got completely confused with statement 2. Took a while to understand, but both scenarios led to the same answer, so was lucky here.
My doubt here is between the two interpretations of statement 2. Namely,
1) Distance between Betty's salary and $35,000 < Distance between Betty's salary and Wilma's salary
1) Distance between Betty's salary and $35,000 < Distance between $35,000 and Wilma's salary

Bunuel , Please help decipher these kind of statements.
SVP
SVP
Joined: 20 Mar 2014
Posts: 2356
Own Kudos [?]: 3650 [0]
Given Kudos: 816
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V44
GPA: 3.7
WE:Engineering (Aerospace and Defense)
Send PM
Re: Both Betty and Wilma earn annual salaries of more than $50,000. [#permalink]
rakshithbabu wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
Both Betty and Wilma earn annual salaries of more than $50000. Is Wilma's annual salary greater than Betty's?

Notice that we are told that both Betty and Wilma earn annual salaries of more than $50,000.

(1) Betty's annual salary is closer to $50,000 than is Wilma's.

----$50,000---(Betty)----(Wilma)---- So, as you can see Wilma's annual salary is greater than Betty's. Sufficient.

(2) Betty's annual salary is closer to $35,000 than it is to Wilma's annual salary.

$35,000----$50,000---(Betty)----(Wilma)---- Again Wilma's annual salary is greater than Betty's. Sufficient.

Answer: D.

Hope it's clear.



I got the answer correct, but got completely confused with statement 2. Took a while to understand, but both scenarios led to the same answer, so was lucky here.
My doubt here is between the two interpretations of statement 2. Namely,
1) Distance between Betty's salary and $35,000 < Distance between Betty's salary and Wilma's salary
2) Distance between Betty's salary and $35,000 < Distance between $35,000 and Wilma's salary

Bunuel , Please help decipher these kind of statements.


Let me try to help.

First of, do not waste time in doubting the official questions. I agree the placement of "it" is kind of ambiguous but both the versions (it=Betty's and it=35000) will lead to the same conclusion of Betty's salary < Wilma's salary as we are given that both the salaries are >50000.
Math Revolution GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Aug 2015
Posts: 10133
Own Kudos [?]: 17060 [0]
Given Kudos: 4
GMAT 1: 760 Q51 V42
GPA: 3.82
Send PM
Re: Both Betty and Wilma earn annual salaries of more than $50,000. [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Forget conventional ways of solving math questions. In DS, Variable approach is the easiest and quickest way to find the answer without actually solving the problem. Remember equal number of variables and independent equations ensures a solution.

Both Betty and Wilma earn annual salaries of more than $50000. Is Wilma's annual salary greater than Betty's?

(1) Betty's annual salary is closer to $50,000 than is Wilma's.
(2) Betty's annual salary is closer to $35,000 than it is to Wilma's annual salary.

In the original condition, we can let Betty's annual salary=b, Wilma's annual salary=w. Then, there are 2 variables and 3 equations from the question and the conditions, so there is high chance (D) will be our answer.
Condition 1 is sufficient as it answers the question 'yes'
Condition 2 is also sufficient for the same reason, so the answer becomes (D).

For cases where we need 1 more equation, such as original conditions with “1 variable”, or “2 variables and 1 equation”, or “3 variables and 2 equations”, we have 1 equation each in both 1) and 2). Therefore, there is 59 % chance that D is the answer, while A or B has 38% chance and C or E has 3% chance. Since D is most likely to be the answer using 1) and 2) separately according to DS definition. Obviously there may be cases where the answer is A, B, C or E.
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 34067
Own Kudos [?]: 853 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Both Betty and Wilma earn annual salaries of more than $50,000. [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Both Betty and Wilma earn annual salaries of more than $50,000. [#permalink]
Moderator:
Math Expert
94607 posts