souvonik2k
sumit411
souvonik2k
By the end of the nineteenth century, five of the Western European states had developed a railroad system, but only one in the East.
(A) only one in the East - no verb.
(B) only one eastern state - no verb.
(C) in the East there was only one state - no verb
(D) in the East only one state did - Correct. Did can replace the verb.
(E) only one in the East had- had cannot replace a verb.
Posted from my mobile device
Hey Souvonik,
Regarding option A
Why we can't apply ellipse
A) only one in the East (had developed railroad system)
TIA
Thank you = Kudos
Hi
sumit411We can apply ellipses if there is no ambiguity.
Here, if we omit ''had developed railroad system'' its not clear what the ''only one in the East'' does.
So we need a verb after that.
Sorry for asking you again but I think I am still not very clear with this.
As far as I know, we repeat a verb if their is any ambiguity. If their is only one possible interpration possible, we don't need to repeat the verb.
Eg: I like pizza more than my wife
( 2 possible interpretation--> I like pizza more than my wife likes pizza OR I like pizza more than I like my wife - - - - > both makes sense)
In this case, repeating a verb will make sense to clear up the ambiguity.
Eg2) John cooks better pizza than his wife
( only one interpretation possible that makes sense - - - > John cooks better pizza than his wife cooks---> other interpretation does not make sense - - - > John cooks better pizza than he cooks his wife (Holy ****))
In example 2, we can repeat the verb. That won't be wrong but the sentence is fine without a verb. So ultimately option A and E comes upto style
Is style tested in GMAT?
Thank you = Kudos