scottnan
I was rejected as well. This has been a very frustrating process. I'm not sure what the adcoms are looking for, but it surely doesn't place enough emphasis on quantitative measures of ability or success (GMAT, GPA, salary, job title), or I would have at least gotten an interview to one of these schools. I wonder how much the adcoms are like the old scouts ridiculed in Moneyball for having unjustifiable and subjective hunches about people.
To future applicants, I'd highly recommend contacting an admissions consultant who can help homogenize your application into the boilerplate schlock I've seen in the applications of my friends and employees who have gotten in.
Thanks to everyone on the site for your insights and lively commentary!
EDIT: removed personal stats because I didn't want anyone I work with to be able to identify me and see my sour-grapes response.
Look at the bright side: you have got another story for a setback essay for the next year. Brighten up, and reapply in six months (it is totally worth another try). Your fundamentals are solid, so it seems that in your case it might have been a problem with execution and correct positioning with schools.
I think while the question you are asking about what schools want is legitimate, the answer to that is almost universally summed up by one phrase: "unique strength".
On the other hand, if you are confident you are a good candidate, a more relevant question to ask would be why did not your message get delivered.
They definitely have no hunches against any applicant, rest assured. It is the opposite: Wharton Adcom loves all prospective students, but admission decision is not about feelings: it is a business decision.
If you decide to reapply, let's chat on your strategy.
Posted from my mobile device