Wharton hopefuls,
I had my interview today and felt like sharing my experience:
I had my interview today at 11:15 with a second year student. She was very nice and was actually from Ghana then worked in New Jersey at Merril Lynch before Wharton.
We spent about 5 minutes we the warm-up type questions, I am from NJ (but now have lived away from home for 5+ years due to the military). She just asked me to briefly tell her about myself in a few sentences.
Then I had my first behavioral question:
How did you resolve a conflict between two members of a team when working towards a goal (not sure if i got the exact wording)
--> I talked about working out a security arrangement in a town that was on a Sunni-Shia faultline in South Baghdad. But for any example I think it is a good practice to keep a narrow scope. I basically approached it by saying:
1) The issue ->Security contract
2) Why did this matter? Potential for sectarian violence, source of employment in depressed urban environment
3) Point of view of Sunni leader
4) Point of view of Shia leader
5) My approach / POV/ how to resolve
6) Outcome
I think if you look at all the questions and bullet them out it can really help when you interview (but of course go with what works for you just liek the dredded GMAT)
My second question was about leading with a organization that had no clear leader (might be slightly off on the wording)
-->I talked about ranger school and how on any particular day a different person is randomly chosen to be a leader. Then I focused on a specific instance where i helped a Sergeant on his planning process which was one of my strengths and how Ranger School requires teamwork etc.
I think here again it is important to pick a single important task or example, at MIT I was off because I would say at Ranger School, I led in rough situations but would not nail down a tactical example of the exchange or provide a specific instance
Finally, my third question was describe a time you convinced someone of your idea when you faced resistance (again my wording here is likely off - its from the list though)
-> I talked about another issue I had on a deployment.
I think you guys got the idea of my approach. I have done 5 interviews and finally got the hang out it (I think).
I would say to provide 1 min of context then spend 3 minutes of your tactical engagement - what you specificially did / said / how the other actors reacted / your solution or compromise then the final minute on the outcome/result and how that result tied into the bigger picture.
I hope this debrief is helpful, once again, I am no expert but I think if you take the questions apart and engage each one with a structure i mind , you will meet all their specific requirements.
Good luck everyone! Now the waiting begins ( as well as my drinking tonight - I am officially done with interviews haha)
Take care