GMAT0010
Hello,
GMAT0010. Consider the argument by Debbie.
So you see is a conclusion marker, meaning that the previous sentence provides the premise for that conclusion. If you straighten out the argument, you get the following:
Debbie: Pain protocols are unnecessary for human beings because a person... can simply be told what pain to expect and can then decide whether or not to undergo the operation.
To weaken her argument, we need to show that pain protocols may, in fact, be necessary, and we need to overturn the reasoning Debbie has used to back up her own conclusion. If a patient could
not simply be told what pain to expect and so forth, then the argument falls apart.
Choice (D), although it does include an often incorrect element in
some, delivers to the necessary end. Since an infant cannot be told what level of pain to expect and decide for itself whether to undergo surgery, perhaps pain protocols should not be deemed
unnecessary. Meanwhile, choice (E) shifts the focus to the
healing process, an unrelated concern to the argument presented. That is, pain protocols are put in place to indicate whether subjects
about to undergo an operation will be at risk of pain and, if so, what step will be taken to minimize or alleviate it. What happens after surgery is not mentioned, so the correct answer should not take the post-op phase into consideration.
I hope that helps. Good luck with your studies.
- Andrew