Background:
I completed undergrad with a degree in political science and a 3.06 GPA. I scored a 720 on the GMAT (Q44 V45). Post-undergrad, I took a series of courses (at a local community college) to boost my MBA application:
-- Financial Accounting - A
-- Managerial Accounting - A
-- Micro Econ - A
-- Macro Econ - A
-- Precalculus - A
-- Calculus I - A
-- Calculus II - A
-- Pre-MBA, Descriptive Statistics - A
-- Pre-MBA, Inferential Statistics - A
Question:
I currently work at one of the top asset management firms in the world. Should I decide to pursue the MBA, which one would strengthen my application more?
1) Certificate in finance with a concentration in investment management and analysis from UCLA extension (or)
2) CFA certification
Thoughts:
I'd like to get your thoughts. For some strange reason adcomms don't give too much weight to the CFA. Nonetheless, being a CFA charter holder opens many doors within my industry. On the other hand, I think the certificate in finance would help my MBA application much more. Assuming I received top-notch grades, a certificate in finance from UCLA extension can offset poor grades received during undergrad and can show adcomms that I am capable of performing well in graduate school. The downside is the fact that the certificate in finance is deemed virtually worthless within my industry.
Given my background, would you choose the CFA or the certificate in finance? Which one would help my application more?