Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
For most test takers, Data Insights is the most challenging section on the GMAT, with test takers scoring several points lower on average on DI than on Quant or Verbal and completing the section with less time to spare.
In Episode 7 of our GMAT Ninja CR series, we are rounding up the oddballs, the misfits, and the format-benders: EXCEPT, Fill-In-The-Blanks, and other unusual Critical Reasoning question types. When you see a question that ends with a literal blank line
Register for the GMAT Club Virtual MBA Spotlight Fair – the world’s premier event for serious MBA candidates. This is your chance to hear directly from Admissions Directors at nearly every Top 30 MBA program..
I've found that picking numbers is often the best strategy for me on VIC (Variables In the Answer Choices) problems. While it is often slower, I think I have a higher probability of getting the answer correct. Additionally, on some problems when I use algebra, it actually takes much longer as I try to write and solve the equations.
Since using more time is the major drawback with picking numbers, I was wondering if you all think it is worth it to solve every answer choice? I realize that it is possible to get multiple answers that may be correct depending on the numbers chosen. However, I have never run into this problem. I'm guessing the probability of this occurring is very low if numbers are chosen intelligently.
I feel like the extra 30 seconds to a minute saved per problem makes it worthwhile to stop as soon as you get a match. I guess the counter argument would be that if you definitely know how to solve a problem, it is worthwhile to make sure you get it correct.
Thoughts?
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
I've found that picking numbers is often the best strategy for me on VIC (Variables In the Answer Choices) problems. While it is often slower, I think I have a higher probability of getting the answer correct. Additionally, on some problems when I use algebra, it actually takes much longer as I try to write and solve the equations.
Since using more time is the major drawback with picking numbers, I was wondering if you all think it is worth it to solve every answer choice? I realize that it is possible to get multiple answers that may be correct depending on the numbers chosen. However, I have never run into this problem. I'm guessing the probability of this occurring is very low if numbers are chosen intelligently.
I feel like the extra 30 seconds to a minute saved per problem makes it worthwhile to stop as soon as you get a match. I guess the counter argument would be that if you definitely know how to solve a problem, it is worthwhile to make sure you get it correct.
Thoughts?
Show more
It is possible and in fact quite likely that you will have multiple matches. We tend to pick the easiest numbers first e.g. x = 0 or x = y = 1 etc since they take very little time. But they do give us multiple matches since the GMAT question maker puts in quite a bit of effort to make the other 4 options too. They are not random though many prep material makers may not put in much effort on the other 4 options. Once you narrow down the options to 2 using the easy numbers, it is not very time consuming to check for those 2. Alternatively, we can also pick up more obscure numbers (or pick them more intelligently e.g. if two options are symmetrical in two variables, the values assumed of the variables should be different) upfront and hope that only one option will match. But mind you, it is risky. I always check each option since the extra 30 sec lost is better than losing the full 2 minutes we put in the question.
I have come across this problem once or twice (probably due to my laziness in number choosing). I know not to choose x and y as the same number, but I have come across a couple of problems where two VIC answers come up with the correct number. I took the extra 30 seconds to pick different numbers and narrowed it down to the correct answer. I found that it wasn't too time consuming since only two answer choices need to be tested with the "new" numbers. Just my 2 cents.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.