Marina
Chris will have a great future as a lawyer. In high school, he won all the debate competitions he participated in.
Which of the following can be said about the above claim?
A.The veracity of the claim is doubtful because it is based on an incorrect analogy
B.The claim is ambiguous, as there is a shifting in the meaning of the terms
C.The above argument obtains its strength from a similarity of two compared situations
D.The two statements are logically inconsistent with each other
E.The claim is built upon a concealed assumption.
My thoughts:
A.The veracity of the claim is doubtful because it is based on an incorrect analogy
What if the analogy is correct? (wrong)
B.The claim is ambiguous, as there is a shifting in the meaning of the terms
Fallacy of Equivocation? we cannot prove that an actual shift exists since we cannot define the actual meanings of each term (lawyer vs good debator) (wrong)
C.The above argument obtains its strength from a similarity of two compared situations
Are the two situations actually similar? What if they are not? (Wrong).
D.The two statements are logically inconsistent with each other
We can't prove this. Afterall they may be consistent, but we don't care. (Wrong)
E.The claim is built upon a concealed assumption.[/quote]
My first choice, but it's generic!
OA ps.