Last visit was: 14 Aug 2026, 08:43 It is currently 14 Aug 2026, 08:43
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
yc168
Joined: 11 Nov 2024
Last visit: 14 Aug 2026
Posts: 1,069
Own Kudos:
951
 [2]
Given Kudos: 786
Products:
Posts: 1,069
Kudos: 951
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
vaibhav_bisht
Joined: 22 Aug 2023
Last visit: 14 Aug 2026
Posts: 8
Given Kudos: 24
Products:
Posts: 8
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
sansun
Joined: 14 Aug 2023
Last visit: 13 Aug 2026
Posts: 61
Own Kudos:
45
 [1]
Given Kudos: 4
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V38
Products:
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V38
Posts: 61
Kudos: 45
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
guddo
Joined: 25 May 2021
Last visit: 14 Aug 2026
Posts: 1,708
Own Kudos:
13,819
 [3]
Given Kudos: 32
Posts: 1,708
Kudos: 13,819
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Classicist: Our mastery of Latin and Ancient Greek is at best imperfect. The best students of a modern language may so immerse themselves in a country where it is spoken as to attain nearly perfect knowledge; but you cannot travel back in time to spend a year abroad at Plato's Academy.

Which one of the following most accurately describes the role played in the classicist's argument by the claim that you cannot travel back in time to spend a year abroad at Plato's Academy?

The classicist concludes that our mastery of Latin and Ancient Greek is imperfect. The reason is that, unlike students of modern languages, students of ancient languages cannot immerse themselves in the original living environment of those languages. The Plato’s Academy line illustrates that contrast: modern-language learners can go abroad, but ancient-language learners cannot go back to the ancient world.

(A) It is the main conclusion drawn in the argument.

This is incorrect. The main conclusion is that our mastery of Latin and Ancient Greek is at best imperfect.

(B) It points up by example a contrast from which the conclusion is drawn.

This is correct. The statement gives an example showing the contrast between modern languages and ancient languages. Modern-language learners can immerse themselves in a living language community; ancient-language learners cannot.

(C) It is a mere rhetorical flourish having no logical relation to the argument's conclusion.

This is incorrect. The statement does have a logical role: it supports the conclusion by explaining why mastery of ancient languages is limited.

(D) It is a premise that guarantees the truth of the argument's conclusion.

This is too strong. The statement supports the conclusion, but it does not guarantee it by itself.

(E) It is an ancillary conclusion drawn in the argument.

This is incorrect. The statement is not a sub-conclusion. It is a supporting example.

Answer: (B)
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7398 posts
Verbal Forum Moderator
703 posts