Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
21 Apr 2020, 02:13
Kudos
Bookmarks
B
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
65%
(hard)
Question Stats:
57% (02:05) correct
43%
(02:11)
wrong
based on 746
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Commissioner: I have been incorrectly criticized for having made my decision on the power plant issue prematurely. I based my decision on the report prepared by the neighborhood association and although I have not studied it thoroughly, I am sure that the information it contains is accurate. Moreover, you may recall that when I received input from the neighborhood association on jail relocation, I agreed with its recommendation.
The commissioner’s argument is LEAST vulnerable to which one of the following criticism?
(A) It takes for granted that the association’s information is not distorted by bias.
(B) It draws a conclusion about the recommendations of the association from incomplete recollections.
(C) It takes for granted that the association’s report is the only direct evidence that needed to be considered.
(D) It hastily concludes that the association’s report is accurate without having studied it in detail.
(E) It takes for granted that agreeing with the association’s past recommendation helps justify agreeing with its current recommendation.
21 Apr 2020, 09:34
Kudos
Bookmarks
(A) Yes, it does do this (by assuming the information is accurate, the commissioner is assuming it is not distorted), and this weakens the commissioners argument
(B) There is no indication that the commissioner's recollection is incomplete--in fact, the commissioner remembers the previous recommendation, and his agreement with it. This doesn't weaken the argument, and is the right answer.
(C) The argument is based on only using the association's report, and this does weaken it
(D) The commissioner admits this, and this certainly weakens the argument.
(E) Yes, this line of reasoning is used by the commissioner to justify not studying the report, and this is a very valid criticism of the argument
(B) There is no indication that the commissioner's recollection is incomplete--in fact, the commissioner remembers the previous recommendation, and his agreement with it. This doesn't weaken the argument, and is the right answer.
(C) The argument is based on only using the association's report, and this does weaken it
(D) The commissioner admits this, and this certainly weakens the argument.
(E) Yes, this line of reasoning is used by the commissioner to justify not studying the report, and this is a very valid criticism of the argument
21 Apr 2020, 18:42
Kudos
Bookmarks
Quote:
argument
=c is wrongly crit by his decision
=based on na report not studied thoroughly
=information 'seems' accurate
=decision was also weighed by his past experience with other na reports
(A) flaw
(C) flaw
(D) flaw
(E) flaw
ans (B) "incomplete recollections" was not a flaw in the argument, in fact, he seems to have remembered things very clearly from his past experience.
