My thought process:
Incorrect: (A) due to there being no standardized method of determining the top speed, nor a central authority to verify any such claims
Choice A is incorrect because of multiple reasons:
(1) "no .. nor" - I believe idiomatically incorrect.
(2) While "being" sometimes can be met within correct answers, I haven't seen usage of "being" in correct answers for questions from OG.
(3) We can replace "due to" with "caused by" in order to verify whether it is acceptable usage. While doing this check, we can see that the answer sounds illogical.
Incorrect: (B) due to the absence of a standardized method of determining the top speed and a central authority to verify any such claims
In order to maintain parallel structure "of" should be added before "a central authority": absence
of a standardized method ... and
of a central authority
Incorrect: (C) in that there is neither a standardized method of determining the top speed, nor can such claims be verified by a central authority
Again a parallelism issue. In the "Neither X nor Y" construction X and Y have to be parallel.
Correct: (D) because of the absence of any standardized method of determining the top speed, and of a central authority to verify any such claims
The best choice. I have the only doubts here about the comma before "and", for me comma before FANBOYS is necessary first of all in the case when we need to separate two clauses.
Incorrect:(E) because there is no standardized method of determining the top speed, or of verifying such claims by a central authority
Several errors with this choice:
(1) If you see "there is" > check for a place.
(2) "no .. or" - unidiomatic.