Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
DIII
Joined: 30 May 2017
Last visit: 27 Dec 2018
Posts: 120
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 31
Location: United States (AL)
Schools: HEC Sept19 intake (S)
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
02 Sep 2017, 21:08
Kudos
Bookmarks
I understand that we can omit words till it becomes ambiguous, but can you give me the proper explanation for not omitting words even when it's not ambiguous?
Eg:
ST1: The practice took in 500$ more in revenue than it did last year. (EMPOWER GMAT)
Why is the above sentence wrong when the [it did] does not exist? (ST2: The practice took in 500$ more in revenue than last year).
I can feel that it's wrong, but I need a proper methodical approach to tackle the ellipses.
Also this,
ST3: With winter coming, I will have higher bills than last year. (Manhattan SC Guide). How is this correct?
Are all ST1, ST2 and ST3 correct?
I hope you can see my confusion.
Thank you.
Eg:
ST1: The practice took in 500$ more in revenue than it did last year. (EMPOWER GMAT)
Why is the above sentence wrong when the [it did] does not exist? (ST2: The practice took in 500$ more in revenue than last year).
I can feel that it's wrong, but I need a proper methodical approach to tackle the ellipses.
Also this,
ST3: With winter coming, I will have higher bills than last year. (Manhattan SC Guide). How is this correct?
Are all ST1, ST2 and ST3 correct?
I hope you can see my confusion.
Thank you.
