It is currently 20 Jan 2018, 22:54

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Consumer advocate: A recent study concluded that top-loading washing

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Expert Post
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
User avatar
G
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4647

Kudos [?]: 9291 [0], given: 117

Re: Consumer advocate: A recent study concluded that top-loading washing [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Jan 2018, 14:13
hellosanthosh2k2 wrote:
Hi,

I feel, had the choice C read as "For some consumers, convenience is the only important factor in determining which type of washing machine is superior", it would have been an apt choice. I feel "only" is making it too strong.

mikemcgarry - can you please help?

Thanks

Dear hellosanthosh2k2,

I'm happy to respond. :-)

I agree that the "only" makes (C) stand out as strong, and that's precisely the point. That's part of why it works as an answer.

You see, the argument itself is a relatively weak argument. This prompt argument easily could have been the prompt for a "weaken the argument" question.

Notice that the negation of (C) would be a devastating objection to this argument, and the Negation Test is one of the strongest for an assumption.

The fact that (C) is a laughably extreme statement and yet the assumption of the argument casts tremendous doubt on the validity of the argument. If Person #1 made the prompt argument, and then Person #2 said, "So, it seems you are assuming that . . ." and then said (C), this would be a brilliantly understated yet devastating objection to the argument. The extremity of (C) perfectly brings out the flimsy weakness of the prompt argument.

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Image

Image

Education is not the filling of a pail, but the lighting of a fire. — William Butler Yeats (1865 – 1939)

Kudos [?]: 9291 [0], given: 117

Magoosh Discount CodesManhattan GMAT Discount CodesMath Revolution Discount Codes
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 13 Nov 2017
Posts: 40

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Re: Consumer advocate: A recent study concluded that top-loading washing [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Jan 2018, 14:47
IMO OA is C

(A) For some consumers the convenience of frontloaders outweighs the advantages of toploaders in assessing which is superior.
-> This is a lure sentence. But! You have to think about a word 'some'. Because of the word 'some', this sentence is just one kind of fact.
So it cannot be an assumption.
(B) Washing machines of a given type should be compared only with washing machines of that type.
-> Nothing.
(C) Convenience is the only important factor in determining which type of washing machine is superior.
-> Correct. If not C, we have to think another factors between top-loading washing machines and front-loaders.
(D) Retrieving clothes from a top-loader is convenient for people who do not use wheelchairs.
-> This is just one kind of fact.
(E) Retrieving clothes from front-loaders is inconvenient for people who are not wheelchair users.
-> This is just one kind of fact.

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 02 Apr 2014
Posts: 350

Kudos [?]: 34 [0], given: 1150

Re: Consumer advocate: A recent study concluded that top-loading washing [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Jan 2018, 09:41
mikemcgarry wrote:
hellosanthosh2k2 wrote:
Hi,

I feel, had the choice C read as "For some consumers, convenience is the only important factor in determining which type of washing machine is superior", it would have been an apt choice. I feel "only" is making it too strong.

mikemcgarry - can you please help?

Thanks

Dear hellosanthosh2k2,

I'm happy to respond. :-)

I agree that the "only" makes (C) stand out as strong, and that's precisely the point. That's part of why it works as an answer.

You see, the argument itself is a relatively weak argument. This prompt argument easily could have been the prompt for a "weaken the argument" question.

Notice that the negation of (C) would be a devastating objection to this argument, and the Negation Test is one of the strongest for an assumption.

The fact that (C) is a laughably extreme statement and yet the assumption of the argument casts tremendous doubt on the validity of the argument. If Person #1 made the prompt argument, and then Person #2 said, "So, it seems you are assuming that . . ." and then said (C), this would be a brilliantly understated yet devastating objection to the argument. The extremity of (C) perfectly brings out the flimsy weakness of the prompt argument.

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)


Hi mikemcgarry, thanks for detailed explanation. It makes sense

Kudos [?]: 34 [0], given: 1150

Re: Consumer advocate: A recent study concluded that top-loading washing   [#permalink] 06 Jan 2018, 09:41

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 23 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

Consumer advocate: A recent study concluded that top-loading washing

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.