GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 25 Apr 2019, 22:57

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Consumer advocate: A recent study concluded that top-loading washing

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

 
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
User avatar
G
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4485
Re: Consumer advocate: A recent study concluded that top-loading washing  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Jan 2018, 15:13
hellosanthosh2k2 wrote:
Hi,

I feel, had the choice C read as "For some consumers, convenience is the only important factor in determining which type of washing machine is superior", it would have been an apt choice. I feel "only" is making it too strong.

mikemcgarry - can you please help?

Thanks

Dear hellosanthosh2k2,

I'm happy to respond. :-)

I agree that the "only" makes (C) stand out as strong, and that's precisely the point. That's part of why it works as an answer.

You see, the argument itself is a relatively weak argument. This prompt argument easily could have been the prompt for a "weaken the argument" question.

Notice that the negation of (C) would be a devastating objection to this argument, and the Negation Test is one of the strongest for an assumption.

The fact that (C) is a laughably extreme statement and yet the assumption of the argument casts tremendous doubt on the validity of the argument. If Person #1 made the prompt argument, and then Person #2 said, "So, it seems you are assuming that . . ." and then said (C), this would be a brilliantly understated yet devastating objection to the argument. The extremity of (C) perfectly brings out the flimsy weakness of the prompt argument.

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)
_________________
Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep


Education is not the filling of a pail, but the lighting of a fire. — William Butler Yeats (1865 – 1939)
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 13 Nov 2017
Posts: 57
Re: Consumer advocate: A recent study concluded that top-loading washing  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Jan 2018, 15:47
IMO OA is C

(A) For some consumers the convenience of frontloaders outweighs the advantages of toploaders in assessing which is superior.
-> This is a lure sentence. But! You have to think about a word 'some'. Because of the word 'some', this sentence is just one kind of fact.
So it cannot be an assumption.
(B) Washing machines of a given type should be compared only with washing machines of that type.
-> Nothing.
(C) Convenience is the only important factor in determining which type of washing machine is superior.
-> Correct. If not C, we have to think another factors between top-loading washing machines and front-loaders.
(D) Retrieving clothes from a top-loader is convenient for people who do not use wheelchairs.
-> This is just one kind of fact.
(E) Retrieving clothes from front-loaders is inconvenient for people who are not wheelchair users.
-> This is just one kind of fact.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
G
Joined: 02 Apr 2014
Posts: 477
Location: India
Schools: XLRI"20
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
GPA: 3.5
Re: Consumer advocate: A recent study concluded that top-loading washing  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Jan 2018, 10:41
mikemcgarry wrote:
hellosanthosh2k2 wrote:
Hi,

I feel, had the choice C read as "For some consumers, convenience is the only important factor in determining which type of washing machine is superior", it would have been an apt choice. I feel "only" is making it too strong.

mikemcgarry - can you please help?

Thanks

Dear hellosanthosh2k2,

I'm happy to respond. :-)

I agree that the "only" makes (C) stand out as strong, and that's precisely the point. That's part of why it works as an answer.

You see, the argument itself is a relatively weak argument. This prompt argument easily could have been the prompt for a "weaken the argument" question.

Notice that the negation of (C) would be a devastating objection to this argument, and the Negation Test is one of the strongest for an assumption.

The fact that (C) is a laughably extreme statement and yet the assumption of the argument casts tremendous doubt on the validity of the argument. If Person #1 made the prompt argument, and then Person #2 said, "So, it seems you are assuming that . . ." and then said (C), this would be a brilliantly understated yet devastating objection to the argument. The extremity of (C) perfectly brings out the flimsy weakness of the prompt argument.

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)


Hi mikemcgarry, thanks for detailed explanation. It makes sense
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 26 Feb 2017
Posts: 3
Re: Consumer advocate: A recent study concluded that top-loading washing  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Feb 2018, 01:04
THE OFFICIAL ANSWER OF THIS QUESTION IS CHOICE A.
PLEASE CORRECT THE ANSWER!!!
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 26 Feb 2017
Posts: 3
Re: Consumer advocate: A recent study concluded that top-loading washing  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Feb 2018, 01:11
Reason for why choice C is wrong:

In order for the conclusion to be true, an assumption MUST be true.

Let's say if choice C not true, i.e Convenience is not the only factor to determine superiority.

The conclusion may still valid. Thus choice C cannot be the assumption.

ONLY CHOICE A IS CORRECT ANSWER. I am damn sure.
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 22 Oct 2018
Posts: 11
CAT Tests
Re: Consumer advocate: A recent study concluded that top-loading washing  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Apr 2019, 21:45
sayantanc2k

I do not understand how C is correct .
Premise says : For some loading through top is inconvenient thus, for them front loading washing machines are superior .

Gap: there is no info provided that shows the connection between inconvenience and superiority .

C says , convenience is the only reason for judging superiority

IS this a MUST ? can it not be subjective ? can i not find something superior to the other because i find one aspect more important than the other ?
can it not be judged by making a total of all the points given to a list of factors ?

A allows for all the above .
A says for some convenience is the most important factor and thus gives a link as to why for some front loader are better , while also allowing for other factors to be as more important for the people who are not in the wheel chair .

i do not understand how option A is only a reiteration of what is already in the passage as , A provides the link between convenience and superiority ( not blatantly provided in the stimulus)

would be thank full if you could help me understand this
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Consumer advocate: A recent study concluded that top-loading washing   [#permalink] 25 Apr 2019, 21:45

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 26 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

Consumer advocate: A recent study concluded that top-loading washing

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.