Consumer advocate: A recent study concluded that top-loading washing machines are superior overall to front-loaders. But front-loaders have the controls and access in front. This is more convenient for wheelchair users, some of whom find it highly inconvenient to remove laundry from top-loaders. So for some consumers front-loaders are superior.
Which one of the following is an assumption upon which the consumer advocate’s argument depends?
There are two factors that are deciding ones whether a machine is superior to other.
1. Top-loading or front-loading for loading and removing laundry.
2. Controls and accessibility from convenience point of view.
Then there's the sub-conclusion based on the study that gives one OVERALL superiority over other. So, the question is 'Does overall has only two factors?'.
How does for some a specific type is superior over other?
(A) For some consumers the convenience of frontloaders
outweighs the advantages of toploaders in assessing which is superior.
(B) Washing machines of a given type
should be compared only with washing machines of that type.
(C) Convenience is the
only important factor in determining which type of washing machine is superior.
(D) Retrieving clothes from a top-loader is convenient for
people who do not use wheelchairs.
(E) Retrieving clothes from front-loaders is inconvenient for
people who are not wheelchair users. - WRONG.
B, D and E are all irrelevant.
C loses for using 'only'.
A gives a perspective that lets us reach the conclusion.
Answer A.