Contraty to the vies of those who oppose recent introduction

Question

Contraty to the vies of those who oppose recent introduction of the law prohibiting smoking cigarettes, cigars, and pipes in restaurants and other public places, the prohibition is quite justified and long overdue. Those who object would do well to remember tha there is much lefislation in this country - for example, the law against jaywalking- which is an infrigement of civil liberties.

Which of the followings statements about the author's intention is correct?

A) He is pointing out that the opponents rationalization of the argument leads to an unreasonable conclusion.
B) He attacks his opponents because they are self interested smokers.
C) He points out that his antagonists arguments lead to a choice between equaly undesireable alternatives.
D) He is attempting to draw and analogy between restricting a person's freedom to cross a busy road anywhere one pleases and banning smoking in public places.
E) He demonstrates that the law against jaywalking applies in this country, as well as other democracies, in which civil liberties is paramount.

karun_aggarwal · Answer

Contraty to the vies of those who oppose recent introduction of the law prohibiting smoking cigarettes, cigars, and pipes in restaurants and other public places, the prohibition is quite justified and long overdue. Those who object would do well to remember tha there is much lefislation in this country - for example, the law against jaywalking- which is an infrigement of civil liberties. 

Which of the followings statements about the author's intention is correct? 

A) He is pointing out that the opponents rationalization of the argument leads to an unreasonable conclusion. 
not at all,,,both author and opponents conclusions are same
B) He attacks his opponents because they are self interested smokers. 
no metion
C) He points out that his antagonists arguments lead to a choice between equaly undesireable alternatives. 
he does'nt give any choice
D) He is attempting to draw and analogy between restricting a person's freedom to cross a busy road anywhere one pleases and banning smoking in public places. 
this is the best as author metions second to explain the opponent frist point
E) He demonstrates that the law against jaywalking applies in this country, as well as other democracies, in which civil liberties is paramount
.there is no demonstartion just a comment,,,,moreover there is no metion about other democarcies.

ywilfred · Answer

D) He is attempting to draw and analogy between restricting a person's freedom to cross a busy road anywhere one pleases and banning smoking in public places. 
- This is clearly what the author is doing by citing the legislation as an exmple.

D it is.

Contraty to the vies of those who oppose recent introduction

Prep Toolkit

Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards