Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
(N/A)
Question Stats:
0%
(00:00)
correct 0%
(00:00)
wrong
based on 1
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Contraty to the vies of those who oppose recent introduction of the law prohibiting smoking cigarettes, cigars, and pipes in restaurants and other public places, the prohibition is quite justified and long overdue. Those who object would do well to remember tha there is much lefislation in this country - for example, the law against jaywalking- which is an infrigement of civil liberties.
Which of the followings statements about the author's intention is correct?
A) He is pointing out that the opponents rationalization of the argument leads to an unreasonable conclusion.
B) He attacks his opponents because they are self interested smokers.
C) He points out that his antagonists arguments lead to a choice between equaly undesireable alternatives.
D) He is attempting to draw and analogy between restricting a person's freedom to cross a busy road anywhere one pleases and banning smoking in public places.
E) He demonstrates that the law against jaywalking applies in this country, as well as other democracies, in which civil liberties is paramount.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Contraty to the vies of those who oppose recent introduction of the law prohibiting smoking cigarettes, cigars, and pipes in restaurants and other public places, the prohibition is quite justified and long overdue. Those who object would do well to remember tha there is much lefislation in this country - for example, the law against jaywalking- which is an infrigement of civil liberties.
Which of the followings statements about the author's intention is correct?
A) He is pointing out that the opponents rationalization of the argument leads to an unreasonable conclusion.
not at all,,,both author and opponents conclusions are same
B) He attacks his opponents because they are self interested smokers.
no metion
C) He points out that his antagonists arguments lead to a choice between equaly undesireable alternatives.
he does'nt give any choice
D) He is attempting to draw and analogy between restricting a person's freedom to cross a busy road anywhere one pleases and banning smoking in public places.
this is the best as author metions second to explain the opponent frist point
E) He demonstrates that the law against jaywalking applies in this country, as well as other democracies, in which civil liberties is paramount
.there is no demonstartion just a comment,,,,moreover there is no metion about other democarcies.
D) He is attempting to draw and analogy between restricting a person's freedom to cross a busy road anywhere one pleases and banning smoking in public places.
- This is clearly what the author is doing by citing the legislation as an exmple.
D it is.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.