Last visit was: 29 Apr 2024, 09:54 It is currently 29 Apr 2024, 09:54

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 93015
Own Kudos [?]: 619931 [3]
Given Kudos: 81630
Send PM
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 04 Mar 2020
Posts: 277
Own Kudos [?]: 293 [0]
Given Kudos: 100
Location: India
GPA: 3.3
Send PM
Manager
Manager
Joined: 18 Sep 2022
Posts: 108
Own Kudos [?]: 31 [0]
Given Kudos: 20
Send PM
Manager
Manager
Joined: 21 Mar 2017
Posts: 88
Own Kudos [?]: 41 [1]
Given Kudos: 52
Send PM
Re: COO of Codal: The code-quality assurance team has reported fewer numbe [#permalink]
1
Kudos
mavrick0102 wrote:
Not sure how C is the correct answer, can someone provide official explanation?


The COO of Codal says that the Project Gutenberg team has made fewer errors per thousand lines of code this year than in the past years, and this is because of the process-quality initiatives taken by Codal. But the Vice President thinks the reduction in errors is because the Project Gutenberg team is using old code. We need to find the statement that challenges the Vice President's theory the most.

Option C is the correct answer. It says that other teams at Codal that did not use old code also had a reduction in errors. So, it's not just because of the old code used by the Project Gutenberg team, but rather the process-quality initiatives taken by Codal.

In simpler terms, the Vice President thinks the reduction in errors is only because of old code used by the Project Gutenberg team, but option C shows that other teams without old code also had fewer errors, which means the old code is not the only reason for fewer errors.
VP
VP
Joined: 03 Jul 2022
Posts: 1242
Own Kudos [?]: 801 [0]
Given Kudos: 21
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
Send PM
Re: COO of Codal: The code-quality assurance team has reported fewer numbe [#permalink]
COO of Codal: The code-quality assurance team has reported fewer number of errors per every thousand lines of code delivered by project Gutenberg's team so far this year than in any of the previous years. Definitely the recent process-quality initiatives taken by our company have started to pay off.

Vice President of Codal: The recent decision taken by Project Gutenberg’s manager to utilize old code, i.e., previously utilized code, is more likely the reason for the reduction in the number of errors

Which of the following, if true, most seriously calls the Vice President's hypothesis into question?

A. Many teams in the company have recently started adopting the reuse policy and are yet to report the benefits.
If others are yet to report, the Vice President's hypothesis can't be doubted.

B. The team members of Project Gutenberg are no more likely than other teams in the company to utilize old code in the current projects.
Additional information. Doesn't impact the validity of the hypothesis.

C. The teams at Codal that did not utilize old code reported a significantly higher reduction in the average number of errors in their code.
This highlights that 'utilization of old code' is not the reason for reduction in the number of errors, thus emphasizing the weakness of the Vice president's hypothesis.

D. The average number of errors per thousand lines of code delivered has been reducing for the past 3 years.
Additional information. Doesn't impact the validity of the hypothesis.

E. The Project Manager has not taken into account the data provided by other teams in the company.
Weakens the hypothesis a bit; however the stimulus (C) is a comparatively stronger in questioning the hypothesis.

(C) is the CORRECT answer
GMAT Club Bot
Re: COO of Codal: The code-quality assurance team has reported fewer numbe [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6923 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
CR Forum Moderator
832 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne