Paraphrasing the stimulus:
- P: One instance ≠ societal fault. Some people pollute, others do not. Don't overgeneralize.
- Q: Even a single major example suggests society’s tendency to pollute—it’s the “easy” path.
Core disagreement:-
- The two are actually disagreeing about whether people are generally inclined to pollute—whether this is a broad disposition or not.
P says: A single incident doesn't mean most people are inclined to pollute.
Q says: If it’s easier to pollute (path of least resistance), that’s probably what people do.
Eliminate options:
A. Pollution as a problem
Both discuss pollution, but not whether it should be considered a problem.
B. Actions follow least resistance
Only Q asserts this directly; P doesn’t.
C. People responsible for pollution
Both seem to accept that people can pollute; not the point of contention.
D. People can change behavior (“not pollute”)
Neither addresses whether behavior can be changed.
E. People are inclined to pollute
This is where the CRux lies! P disputes general inclination; Q supports it.