Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
We’ve worked incredibly hard to build TTP into the best test prep experience possible, and it would mean a lot to us to win Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep. If TTP has helped you, we’d be incredibly grateful for your vote.
What does test anxiety really look like on the GMAT? For many test takers, it does not look like a panic attack. Instead, it shows up as brain fog, rereading, negative comparisons, mental noise....
Top scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful EA course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Perfect class schedule and easy course access for working professionals. Class starts Sundays Sept. 6, 2026.
Meet AdComs and explore top Master’s programs - MiM, MiF, MSc, MSBA and more. - Application Fee Waivers - Free 1-Week of GMAT Club Tests: - Master's Application Toolkit - Grand Prize Giveaway
Elite scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful GMAT course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Tues/Thurs Sept. 15, 2026 - Nov. 15, 2027, 7:00pm-9:00pm EST
Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Mon, Tues, Wed, Thur, Fri Sept. 21, 2026 - Oct. 9, 2027, 7:00pm-10:00pm EST
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
(N/A)
Question Stats:
100%
(01:51)
correct 0%
(00:00)
wrong
based on 3
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
A Famous Editor: American writers today lack skills that were common among American writers of preceding centuries. I believe this because my analysis of 100 books, 50 old and 50 contemporary, demonstrates convincingly that none of the contemporary writings are executed as skillfully as the older writings.
Which of the following points to the most serious logical flaw in the Editor’s argument?
1) There could be criteria other than the technical skill of the writer by which to evaluate a book. 2) The particular methods currently used by American writers could require less literary skill than do methods used by writers in other parts of the world. 3) The editors fame could cause people to accept the editors thesis even without their reading the books to consider the validity of his thesis. 4) An individual who was not familiar with the language of literary criticism might not be convinced by the editors analysis of the 100 books 5) The books chosen for analysis could be those that most support his thesis.
Can someone tell me why E is correct. How to approach these kind of questions
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
A Famous Editor: American writers today lack skills that were common among American writers of preceding centuries. I believe this because my analysis of 100 books, 50 old and 50 contemporary, demonstrates convincingly that none of the contemporary writings are executed as skillfully as the older writings.
Which of the following points to the most serious logical flaw in the Editor’s argument?
1) There could be criteria other than the technical skill of the writer by which to evaluate a book. 2) The particular methods currently used by American writers could require less literary skill than do methods used by writers in other parts of the world. 3) The editors fame could cause people to accept the editors thesis even without their reading the books to consider the validity of his thesis. 4) An individual who was not familiar with the language of literary criticism might not be convinced by the editors analysis of the 100 books 5) The books chosen for analysis could be those that most support his thesis.
Can someone tell me why E is correct. How to approach these kind of questions
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.