1) Agricultural societies cannot exist without staple crops.
2) Several food plants, such as kola and okra, are known to have been domesticated in western Africa, but they are all supplemental food
3) All the recorded staple crops grown in western Africa were introduced from elsewhere, beginning, at some unknown date, with rice and yams.
4) Therefore, discovering when rice and yams were introduced into western Africa would establish the earliest date at which agricultural societies could have arisen there. <-- conclusion
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
A. People in western Africa did not develop staple crops that they stopped cultivating once rice and yams were introduced
- I'll go with this one. If they did not develop any other staple crops other than rice and yam, then based on the earliest date when both crops were introduced, the time agricultural societies rose there could be determined.
B. There are no plants native to western Africa that, if domesticated, could serve as staple food crops.
- If so, then the staple crops will have to be introduced, but they need not be yam and rice, two crops which the conclusion is based on. So this is out.
C. Rice and yams were grown as staple crops by the earliest agricultural societies outside of western Africa
- Does not have to mean these societies wil move to western Africa
D. Kola and okra are better suited to growing conditions in western Africa than domesticated rice and yams are
- Not useful. Not suited to western africa does not rule out that the crops can be planted (it might be more difficult to cultivate them, but it's not impossible)
E. Kola and okra were domesticated in western Africa before rice and yams were introduced there
- Not useful
A is best.