GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 15 Aug 2018, 09:46

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# CR: Pro Football Drafts

Author Message
Intern
Joined: 25 May 2008
Posts: 40

### Show Tags

04 Dec 2008, 13:57
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Kaplan Practice question 48

In the past 6 pro football drafts, 4 of the 6 players selected by Team A are now starters on the squad. On Team B, only 2 of the 6 players selected in the draft are starters. SO, a football player selected by Team A from the draft pool has a higher probability of becoming a starter than if he is selected by Team B.

Which of the following if true, would be the best reason to reject this argument.

a. Two of the four starters on the Team A are the songs of the coach.
b. Team B has a new owner and coaching staff.
c. Team B has a new state-of-the-art gym.
d. Team B's pick is a quarterback, and the starting quarterback is retiring.
e. Team A has had the first draft pick for the past 6 years, while Team B has had the last pick. This year it is reversed.

--== Message from GMAT Club Team ==--

This is not a quality discussion. It has been retired.

If you would like to discuss this question please re-post it in the respective forum. Thank you!

To review the GMAT Club's Forums Posting Guidelines, please follow these links: Quantitative | Verbal Please note - we may remove posts that do not follow our posting guidelines. Thank you.
 Kaplan GMAT Prep Discount Codes Optimus Prep Discount Codes EMPOWERgmat Discount Codes
Senior Manager
Joined: 04 Aug 2008
Posts: 362
Re: CR: Pro Football Drafts  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Dec 2008, 13:59
On the GMAT answer would be E
But
in a real life answer would be A

_________________

The one who flies is worthy. The one who is worthy flies. The one who doesn't fly isn't worthy

Manager
Joined: 11 Mar 2008
Posts: 106
Re: CR: Pro Football Drafts  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Dec 2008, 15:44
Ans is E here is why:

this is a weaken the conclusion question. so let's first locate the conclusion and the evidence:

Concl: Player selected by A has more chances of becoming starter than player selected by B
Evidence (why?): past 6 drafts 4/6 are starters

Goal: to show that player selected by A doesn’t have more chances
Paraphrasing an answer usually helps to get a better understanding of a question, to better relate to it, even if your paraphrasing is not one of the choices

my paraphrase was: A had more \$\$ to spend than B; currently A is out of cash whereas B found a new, loaded sponsor )))

hbs2012 wrote:
Kaplan Practice question 48

In the past 6 pro football drafts, 4 of the 6 players selected by Team A are now starters on the squad. On Team B, only 2 of the 6 players selected in the draft are starters. SO, a football player selected by Team A from the draft pool has a higher probability of becoming a starter than if he is selected by Team B.

Which of the following if true, would be the best reason to reject this argument.

a. Two of the four starters on the Team A are the songs of the coach.
how does this statement help to weaken the conclusion - players selected by A have more chances? sons of the coach will not allow anymore starters? maybe yes maybe no one thing we know is we dont know
b. Team B has a new owner and coaching staff.
this choice wants you to make an assumption that possibly the new staff/coach will hire more starters.
c. Team B has a new state-of-the-art gym.
yeah, and my GF is Pamela Anderson -- how is either of the statements going to help to weaken the conclusion? i dont want to know
d. Team B's pick is a quarterback, and the starting quarterback is retiring.
same as C and B – so what?
e. Team A has had the first draft pick for the past 6 years, while Team B has had the last pick. This year it is reversed.
now this one nicely explains that the formula "starters have more chances to get into A" is wrong. this ans choice explains that the reason B was selecting less starters because B' s coach was forced to pick from the crumbs left on the table
Senior Manager
Joined: 12 Oct 2008
Posts: 486
Re: CR: Pro Football Drafts  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Dec 2008, 16:24
IMO E
Manager
Joined: 09 Nov 2008
Posts: 148
Re: CR: Pro Football Drafts  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Dec 2008, 23:55
I pick E
Director
Joined: 01 Aug 2008
Posts: 627
Re: CR: Pro Football Drafts  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Dec 2008, 08:45
one more E.

--== Message from GMAT Club Team ==--

This is not a quality discussion. It has been retired.

If you would like to discuss this question please re-post it in the respective forum. Thank you!

To review the GMAT Club's Forums Posting Guidelines, please follow these links: Quantitative | Verbal Please note - we may remove posts that do not follow our posting guidelines. Thank you.
Re: CR: Pro Football Drafts &nbs [#permalink] 05 Dec 2008, 08:45
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# CR: Pro Football Drafts

Moderators: GMATNinja, GMATNinjaTwo

# Events & Promotions

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.