Last visit was: 03 Jun 2026, 01:59 It is currently 03 Jun 2026, 01:59
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
sushma0805
Joined: 03 Feb 2010
Last visit: 03 Dec 2010
Posts: 36
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 4
Posts: 36
Kudos: 206
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
ykaiim
Joined: 25 Aug 2007
Last visit: 21 Aug 2012
Posts: 516
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 40
WE 1: 3.5 yrs IT
WE 2: 2.5 yrs Retail chain
Posts: 516
Kudos: 6,015
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
ashnag
Joined: 15 Mar 2010
Last visit: 29 Jun 2010
Posts: 10
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 4
Posts: 10
Kudos: 5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
mads
Joined: 29 Oct 2009
Last visit: 14 Jul 2015
Posts: 123
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 12
Concentration: General Management, Sustainability
WE:Consulting (Computer Software)
Posts: 123
Kudos: 222
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Conclusion : Thus, if the Big Apple Stadium replaced some of its theater-style seating with bench seating, its profits would increase.

Here we need to find what Big Apple Stadium assumed in taking the above decision that is vulnerable to criticism.

(A) some fans come to the Big Apple Stadium to support their teams by waving signs, and so might choose bench seating
>> Do not talk about profits.

(B) the revenue from snacks ordered by fans in bench seating compensates for any revenue lost from patrons buying tickets for less expensive seats
>> Yes this is the assumption that is made for taking the decision. This assumption is vulnerable to criticism because in the passage, the relation between revenue through concession stands and the revenue from expensive seats is not established.
(C) patrons of Big Apple Stadium who would choose bench seating would be an exception to the generalization about making more trips to the concession stands
>> This would weaken the conclusion. Not a correct answer for the question.
(D) a stadium's patrons who spend less time in their seats typically purchase less expensive snacks than those who spend more time sitting in their seats
>> Same as above. Weakens conclusion.
(E) with enough bench seating to accommodate all the Big Apple patrons interested in such seating, there would be no view except of other patrons
>> Not relevant for the profits.
User avatar
sushma0805
Joined: 03 Feb 2010
Last visit: 03 Dec 2010
Posts: 36
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 4
Posts: 36
Kudos: 206
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sushma0805
Currently, the Big Apple Stadium, which sells food and drinks to patrons, has only expensive theater-style seating. However, most fans would rather have less expensive bench seats since they stand for most of the game to see as much as possible. Moreover, patrons in other stadiums' bench seating sections often leave their seats, because the bench seats are uncomfortable, using many of those trips to buy food or souvenirs from concession stands. Thus, if the Big Apple Stadium replaced some of its theater-style seating with bench seating, its profits would increase.

The argument is vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it gives reason to believe that it is likely that

(A) some fans come to the Big Apple Stadium to support their teams by waving signs, and so might choose bench seating

(B) the revenue from snacks ordered by fans in bench seating compensates for any revenue lost from patrons buying tickets for less expensive seats

(C) patrons of Big Apple Stadium who would choose bench seating would be an exception to the generalization about making more trips to the concession stands

(D) a stadium's patrons who spend less time in their seats typically purchase less expensive snacks than those who spend more time sitting in their seats

(E) with enough bench seating to accommodate all the Big Apple patrons interested in such seating, there would be no view except of other patrons



OA C

OE : Choice C says that patrons of the Big Apple Stadium who would choose bench seating would be an exception to the generalization about making more trips to the concession stand. The passage states that the stadium patrons, even with theater style seats, stand for most of the game. It is fair to infer that given bench style seats, which are said to be uncomfortable, they would continue to stand, which would negate the effect stated that people make more trips due to the uncomfortable seats. Choice C is correct.

src : knewton.



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Critical Reasoning (CR) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7394 posts
643 posts