In saying that ^

here's my answer
We are told of a factors affecting the decision of Davison River farmers: whether to plan Spring or Winter wheat
- both are EQUALLY profitable
- However, government restrictions on the use of water would result in lower than average per acre yields of winter, not spring, wheat
We are then told that the spring wheat will be more profitable than winter wheat and are asked to come up with a premise justifying why spring wheat
will be more profitable B is incorrect because it does not provide a logical reason why spring wheat would be more profitable. If anything this serves to go against the notion that spring wheat should be planted.
C this provides a potential reason why spring wheat IN ISOLATION is likely to be more profitable, but it doesn't explain the relation to winter wheat. For this reason, C is incorrect
D is incorrect - just because something has more uses than another thing, doesn't mean that something is more profitable than the other.
E is incorrect because a comparison between the profitability of planting spring wheat and Rye doesn't serve to explain why spring is more profitable than winter wheat.
A is difficult to tie back because of the inferences we need to make.
First profit across both seeds is comparable. This means winter wheat could have a higher price, but also higher costs, than spring wheat.
E.g. Winter wheat sell price = $100 , costs = $80
Spring wheat sell price = $50, costs = $30
profit = $20 across both.
But we are told that the yields (supply) of winter wheat are going to be lower.
Hypothetical supply: 100 units of winter wheat, 1000 units of spring
$20*100 < $20* 1000
Thus, it is inferred that the lower yields (supply) can't be compensated for by higher prices.
For this reason, A is correct
It may be easier to POE Your way to A