Last visit was: 17 Jul 2025, 14:46 It is currently 17 Jul 2025, 14:46
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
hemanthp
Joined: 31 Jul 2010
Last visit: 19 Jul 2016
Posts: 150
Own Kudos:
1,331
 [47]
Given Kudos: 104
Status:Keep fighting!
Affiliations: IIT Madras
 Q49  V34 GMAT 2: 720  Q50  V37
WE 1: 2+ years - Programming
WE 2: 3+ years - Product developement,
WE 3: 2+ years - Program management
Posts: 150
Kudos: 1,331
 [47]
7
Kudos
Add Kudos
40
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
KapTeacherEli
User avatar
Kaplan GMAT Instructor
Joined: 25 Aug 2009
Last visit: 03 Oct 2013
Posts: 612
Own Kudos:
675
 [13]
Given Kudos: 2
Location: Cambridge, MA
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 612
Kudos: 675
 [13]
11
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
siyer
Joined: 15 Apr 2010
Last visit: 18 Oct 2017
Posts: 112
Own Kudos:
190
 [4]
Given Kudos: 25
 Q48  V39
Posts: 112
Kudos: 190
 [4]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
ahsanmalik12
Joined: 07 Sep 2010
Last visit: 02 Jan 2011
Posts: 24
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 8
Posts: 24
Kudos: 19
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Eric says "most people will probably know at least one dropout."

in option B "B The dropout rate varies little from region to region across the country.
Correct answer. The drop out rate has to be uniform across the country for Erik's argument to hold good. If there is an area where the drop out rate is much lower than 10% then the probability of *everyone *knowing at least 1 dropout (out of a 100 acquaintances) falls."

Eric never stated that *Everyone* knew atleast 1 dropout, but "most of the people".
So the answer should be "C"

Experts, please comment...
User avatar
gurpreetsingh
Joined: 12 Oct 2009
Last visit: 15 Jun 2019
Posts: 2,273
Own Kudos:
3,859
 [1]
Given Kudos: 235
Status:<strong>Nothing comes easy: neither do I want.</strong>
Location: Malaysia
Concentration: Technology, Entrepreneurship
Schools: ISB '15 (M)
GMAT 1: 670 Q49 V31
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V35
Products:
Schools: ISB '15 (M)
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V35
Posts: 2,273
Kudos: 3,859
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ahsanmalik12
Eric says "most people will probably know at least one dropout."

in option B "B The dropout rate varies little from region to region across the country.
Correct answer. The drop out rate has to be uniform across the country for Erik's argument to hold good. If there is an area where the drop out rate is much lower than 10% then the probability of *everyone *knowing at least 1 dropout (out of a 100 acquaintances) falls."

Eric never stated that *Everyone* knew atleast 1 dropout, but "most of the people".
So the answer should be "C"

Experts, please comment...

if you negate C- it does not weaken the argument, thus it is not an assumption. But if you negate B, the conclusion of Eric will be weaken as the statistical data used will be questioned.
User avatar
piyushagarwal
Joined: 30 Jul 2010
Last visit: 12 Jun 2012
Posts: 68
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 28
Status:Will Retake GMAT
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.11
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Posts: 68
Kudos: 22
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
It will be B as its clear that Erik has assumed the drop rate is same all across the country. If you negate this point, his argument weakens..
User avatar
arundas
Joined: 25 Jul 2010
Last visit: 21 Aug 2012
Posts: 99
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 15
Status:ISB, Hyderabad
Concentration: Strategy
 Q50  V35 GMAT 2: 740  Q50  V40
WE 1: 4 years Software Product Development
WE 2: 3 years ERP Consulting
Posts: 99
Kudos: 101
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Stumped on this one. No clue. Will wait for the enlighted souls to share their perspective on this one.

Can some one explain how can some body arrive at the conclusion "most people will probably know at least one dropout" based on premise "the average person has about one hundred different acquaintances, and the normal high school dropout rate is only 10%" .
User avatar
venugopis
Joined: 23 Aug 2010
Last visit: 14 Mar 2013
Posts: 8
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 8
Kudos: 91
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
For assumption questions. Negate the answer choice, and if that neagted answer choice weakens the arguement , thats the assumption.
So, if an average person know about one hundred different acquaintances located in only one specific area, not every part of the country then the argument is weaken.
Here, negate choice B - "The dropout rate varies little from region to region across the country. Which will be changed as" – “The dropout rate varies little from region to region across the country”.
User avatar
Zatarra
User avatar
Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 31 Jan 2010
Last visit: 07 May 2016
Posts: 310
Own Kudos:
361
 [1]
Given Kudos: 149
 Q49  V42
WE 1: 4 years Tech
Posts: 310
Kudos: 361
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The gist of the argument presented by eric is eryone has 100 acquaintances , so there are more chances of people knowing drop-outs in common.
The conclusion is not the probability that everyone knows at least 1 drop - out. The conclusion is that "That more than 80 % of people know a dropout is not worrisome"
What he says is "so what if 80% people know a dropout,even if the drop out rate is miniscule ,80% of the populate will know dropouts in common because 1 has 100s of friends. and they could have a dropout friend in common as common friend just the way it is on facebook.
So if we negate option B, we get "the normal dropout rate varies a lot from place to place "and in this case it does become a cause of concern , if the dropout rate in Oklahoma is 10% and the dropout rate in california is 60%.
User avatar
Zatarra
User avatar
Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 31 Jan 2010
Last visit: 07 May 2016
Posts: 310
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 149
 Q49  V42
WE 1: 4 years Tech
Posts: 310
Kudos: 361
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
KapTeacherEli
hemanthp
The same assumption exists in Deb and Erik's discussion; the reason it's harder to spot is because in the case of graduation rates, the its not obvious incorrect. One could perfectly reasonably assume that students drop out at relatively consistent rates across a small country. But what if they didn't? If ALL the country's dropouts were normally confined to one or two provinces, but now 80% of the entire country's population knows a dropout, Erik would be mistaken. Deb's statistic would be cause for alarm, as it would indicate the problem was spreading! On the other hand, if the 10% dropout rate was universal across the country, then Erik is right: Deb's statistic is unsurprising and not alarming. Thus, (B) clearly identifies the assumption in Erik's argument.
Hope this helps!
hi eli, thanks for the intervention.What i cudnt get from your explanation is "the statistic is a case for alarm in case the % of drop outs may vary from region to region or the dropout percentage may increase in a few places?
My explanation takes the variation in percentage into consideration but not variation from region to region.
User avatar
KapTeacherEli
User avatar
Kaplan GMAT Instructor
Joined: 25 Aug 2009
Last visit: 03 Oct 2013
Posts: 612
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
Location: Cambridge, MA
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 612
Kudos: 675
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi mundasingh,

I'm not quite sure what you're asking; can you clarify?

Thanks!
User avatar
Zatarra
User avatar
Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 31 Jan 2010
Last visit: 07 May 2016
Posts: 310
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 149
 Q49  V42
WE 1: 4 years Tech
Posts: 310
Kudos: 361
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
KapTeacherEli
Hi mundasingh,

I'm not quite sure what you're asking; can you clarify?

Thanks!
Hi Eli,
You had written
One could perfectly reasonably assume that students drop out at relatively consistent rates across a small country. But what if they didn't? If ALL the country's dropouts were normally confined to one or two provinces, ----- Deb's statistic would be cause for alarm, as it would indicate the problem was spreading!
so does this mean that even if the rate was consistently 10% but spread uniformly all over the country, would it be cause for alarm ?
I had only taken consistent rates into consideration in the explanation that i had offered just before you posted.My take was : If the rate was 10 % in 1 province and 60% in other provinces, it would be cause for alarm.
User avatar
KapTeacherEli
User avatar
Kaplan GMAT Instructor
Joined: 25 Aug 2009
Last visit: 03 Oct 2013
Posts: 612
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
Location: Cambridge, MA
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 612
Kudos: 675
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mundasingh123
KapTeacherEli
Hi mundasingh,

I'm not quite sure what you're asking; can you clarify?

Thanks!
Hi Eli,
You had written
One could perfectly reasonably assume that students drop out at relatively consistent rates across a small country. But what if they didn't? If ALL the country's dropouts were normally confined to one or two provinces, ----- Deb's statistic would be cause for alarm, as it would indicate the problem was spreading!
so does this mean that even if the rate was consistently 10% but spread uniformly all over the country, would it be cause for alarm ?
I had only taken consistent rates into consideration in the explanation that i had offered just before you posted.My take was : If the rate was 10 % in 1 province and 60% in other provinces, it would be cause for alarm.
Hi mundasingh,

Erik's point was that even a very low dropout rate (10%) could account for Deb's statistic, and therefore Deb's statistic is not cause for alarm.

However, Erik's example would only work if the 10% dropout rate he offered as an example were spread evenly across the country. If low graduation rates are normally confined to a specific area, then Erik would be wrong; Deb's statistic that 80% of the population knows someone who left high school would be quite worrying, because it would indicate that the problem is beginning to spread to other parts of the country.
User avatar
Zatarra
User avatar
Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 31 Jan 2010
Last visit: 07 May 2016
Posts: 310
Own Kudos:
361
 [1]
Given Kudos: 149
 Q49  V42
WE 1: 4 years Tech
Posts: 310
Kudos: 361
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
KapTeacherEli
mundasingh123
KapTeacherEli
Hi mundasingh,

I'm not quite sure what you're asking; can you clarify?

Thanks!
Hi Eli,
You had written
One could perfectly reasonably assume that students drop out at relatively consistent rates across a small country. But what if they didn't? If ALL the country's dropouts were normally confined to one or two provinces, ----- Deb's statistic would be cause for alarm, as it would indicate the problem was spreading!
so does this mean that even if the rate was consistently 10% but spread uniformly all over the country, would it be cause for alarm ?
I had only taken consistent rates into consideration in the explanation that i had offered just before you posted.My take was : If the rate was 10 % in 1 province and 60% in other provinces, it would be cause for alarm.
Hi mundasingh,

Erik's point was that even a very low dropout rate (10%) could account for Deb's statistic, and therefore Deb's statistic is not cause for alarm.

However, Erik's example would only work if the 10% dropout rate he offered as an example were spread evenly across the country. If low graduation rates are normally confined to a specific area, however, then Erik would be wrong; Deb's statistic that 80% of the population knows someone who left high school would be quite worrying, because it would indicate that the problem is beginning to spread to other parts of the country.
Thanks for confirming this Eli.I got your point and the line of reasoning. This hardly involve dany maths as 1 guy was professing
avatar
samshiva
Joined: 20 Nov 2012
Last visit: 20 Nov 2012
Posts: 1
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
thanks a lot.... thanks for your information... very much useful for me.... :)

amitysoft dot com
avatar
moind
Joined: 30 Jun 2011
Last visit: 18 Feb 2024
Posts: 3
Given Kudos: 7
Posts: 3
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Eli,

A quick question here, as you mentioned earlier, the impt point here is that the assumption will make Deb's statistic unsurprising and not alarming. In that case, wouldn't answer C also be a good candidate for the correct answer.

Kindly get back when possible, thanks.


KapTeacherEli
hemanthp
Deb: It ’ s worrisome that 80% of the people in this country know at least one person who did not finish high school.

Erik: But the average person has about one hundred different acquaintances, so, even if the normal high school dropout rate is only 10%, most people will probably know at least one dropout.

Erik ’ s argument relies on the assumption that:

- The normal dropout rate has remained very stable over time.
- The dropout rate varies little from region to region across the country.
- The number of people who know a dropout is usually over 80% of the population.
- The statistics cited by Deb don ’ t overstate the fraction of the population that actually does know a high school dropout.
- Being personally acquainted with a dropout causes more anxiety about the dropout problem than do the dropout statistics themselves.

Please discuss. I have already given the OA.
Let's try this:

Quote:
Zhou: The newspaper claims that 80% of the world's population knows someone from the United States of America, but I don't believe it for a second.

Valerie: Actually, that number seems quite reasonable. After all, Americans make up 5% of the population of the world. Since the average person has 100 acquaintances, it's no surprise if a few are American.
Valerie's argument sounds pretty fishy, huh? In fact, it would be amazing if 80% of the world's population knew someone from the US. After all, the overwhelming majority of American live in one place--America! Valerie's logic would only apply if Americans were distributed more or less evenly among the globe, which they clearly are not. Many people in China, India, Africa, and South America would never have had the opportunity to meet anyone from the US.

The same assumption exists in Deb and Erik's discussion; the reason it's harder to spot is because in the case of graduation rates, the its not obvious incorrect. One could perfectly reasonably assume that students drop out at relatively consistent rates across a small country. But what if they didn't? If ALL the country's dropouts were normally confined to one or two provinces, but now 80% of the entire country's population knows a dropout, Erik would be mistaken. Deb's statistic would be cause for alarm, as it would indicate the problem was spreading! On the other hand, if the 10% dropout rate was universal across the country, then Erik is right: Deb's statistic is unsurprising and not alarming. Thus, (B) clearly identifies the assumption in Erik's argument.

Hope this helps!
User avatar
KapTeacherEli
User avatar
Kaplan GMAT Instructor
Joined: 25 Aug 2009
Last visit: 03 Oct 2013
Posts: 612
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
Location: Cambridge, MA
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 612
Kudos: 675
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The questions asks about an assumption made by Erik's argument. (C) might tangentially strengthen Erik's conclusion, but it has nothing to to with his reasoning.
avatar
four321zero
Joined: 06 Jan 2015
Last visit: 14 Jul 2016
Posts: 9
Own Kudos:
3
 [1]
Given Kudos: 42
Posts: 9
Kudos: 3
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
VerbalBot
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.


To be honest I can't seem to be able to grasp any of the reasoning given in the posts above.

For my understanding, lets divide the country in 2 regions. West and East, with a population of 500 each.

Deb finds it alarming that 80% of people know a dropout i.e. (800 people out of 1000 know a dropout in the country).
Erik says nothing to worry about because the dropouts are really low, its just that the same dropout may be an acquaintance of more than 1 person, since an avg person has around 100 acquaintances.

Negating B:
Drop our rate varies a LOT from region to region
Now lets say in East the dropout rate is 10% (i.e. 50 drop outs amongst a population of 500), and in West its 20% (i.e. 100 drop outs out of a total of 500)
So in total we have 150 drop outs from 1000.

How does this in any way prove or disprove that amongst these 800 people no SINGLE person will or will not know more than 1 drop out? If A knows B who is a drop out from those 150, why is it unlikely that A can't know 99 other non-drop outs?
User avatar
IanStewart
User avatar
GMAT Tutor
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Last visit: 17 Jul 2025
Posts: 4,145
Own Kudos:
10,635
 [1]
Given Kudos: 98
 Q51  V47
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,145
Kudos: 10,635
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I don't know which prep company "designed" this question, but it's a nearly exact copy of an official problem:

https://gmatclub.com/forum/roland-the-a ... -9618.html

The official problem, though, is precisely worded, while this question is not (for example, in this question the stem talks about people who didn't finish high school, while the answer choices talk about "dropouts", and it's not clear those are the same thing; that's not an issue in the official version). There's no good reason to study this question instead of the official one, and I don't know why it's such a common practice among prep companies to produce inferior near-copies of official problems.
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 18,455
Own Kudos:
Posts: 18,455
Kudos: 954
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7359 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
235 posts