Last visit was: 06 May 2024, 03:21 It is currently 06 May 2024, 03:21

Share
User avatar
6 years
India
2024
Male
Score: 329 GRE
GPA: 3.2
Pre-MBA industry: Energy and Utilities
Post-MBA industry: Consulting
Hi, I am an IIT KGP'17 batch graduate with a major in Civil Engineering. I have been working with a Fortune 500 Oil & Gas company for the past 6 years. My target industry is consulting preferably ESG domain preferably in the US. My short-term goal is to work as an ESG/Supply chain specialist and my long-term goal is to work with a major consulting firm in CXO-level roles.
Jones Rice
Full Time MBA
1 month ago
Round 2
AppliedJan 4, 24
WaitlistedMar 24, 24
Tuck
Full Time MBA
1 month ago
Round 2
DeniedMar 14, 24
Fuqua
Full Time MBA
1 month ago
Round 2
AppliedJan 8, 24
DeniedFeb 12, 24
McCombs
Full Time MBA
1 month ago
Round 2
AppliedJan 5, 24
AcceptedMar 21, 24
Scholarship25%
Ross Michigan
Full Time MBA
1 month ago
Round 2
AppliedJan 11, 24
DeniedFeb 13, 24
Kenan-Flagler
Full Time MBA
1 month ago
Round 2
AppliedJan 4, 24
Invited to interviewMar 12, 24
ISB
Full Time MBA
1 month ago
Round 2
AcceptedFeb 9, 24
ScholarshipNone
Sloan MIT
MIT-Leaders for Global Operations
4 months ago
Round 1
DeniedDec 15, 23
Comments (6 comments)
User avatar
10 Oct 2023, 22:45
Tuck and Fuqua fall into the aspirational group, in my opinion. US schools receive a high number of applicants with operations backgrounds, and it can be challenging to establish a strong fit with schools that primarily focus on consulting and healthcare and pharma. While not impossible, admission can often come down to factors such as your GPA, GRE score, gender, and more. I don't have a sufficient reference point for operations professionals at Tuck and Duke, but I have substantial evidence of healthcare consultants successfully gaining admission.

Applicants should not base their applications to highly selective programs with limited seats solely on probability.
Not everyone needs to be an outlier in a class. While schools aim for diversity, this doesn't require an exotic background or rare skillset. Admissions committees seek students who will contribute diverse perspectives to the class, and these experiences can come from various sources. Smaller classes also value students from prestigious colleges worldwide, as it enhances their own reputation, which is why they consider applicants like you seriously.

When it comes to the diversity aspect, where you're competing for around 25 seats in a class of 50, don't limit yourself to conventional diversity criteria like race and gender. Think beyond these boundaries and consider your cultural, geographic, and socioeconomic background. Have you overcome significant challenges in life? Have you excelled in a specific field or hobby? Have you had a unique education or work experience? These factors can contribute to your diversity and make you stand out, offering a unique perspective in the classroom.

I recently worked with an applicant of average standing, and he has been accepted into Tepper's Masters in Product Management program. This program is highly selective, with a class size of just 50, and it offers a targeted pipeline into big tech product management roles. It's a logical choice for someone with a product background who sees more value in this program than a traditional two-year MBA at Tepper. It comes with a lower opportunity cost and strong management support. If the school sees why, you might pick LGO over the MBA, and is convinced about your focus on the sector, I don't see why they wouldn't take you. But I guess you should apply where you really want to go..


Aanchal Sahni (INSEAD alum, former INSEAD MBA admissions interviewer)
MBAGuideConsulting
LinkedIn |WEBSITE: https://mbaguideconsulting.com/ | Message: +91 9971200927| email- mbaguideconsulting@gmail.com
User avatar
10 Oct 2023, 13:48
ESG may be a bit tough to recruit for but you have a good background so it’s a good goal to have. It’s definitely a stronger position than trying to go for tech consulting or something like that.

Supply chain is hopefully less competitive field. Between these two, hopefully you get a back up offer and you can shop for something better when you recruit.

You can also consider UNC and Jones for safeties and potentially Darden for target… 🤷‍♂️

Good luck!
User avatar
10 Oct 2023, 13:42
Thank you for your response, by publications you meant UG research publications?
User avatar
10 Oct 2023, 13:49
I’m sorry. That was an AutoCorrect and they cannot remember what I meant to write 😱 so I went ahead and deleted that comment…
User avatar
10 Oct 2023, 20:14
Hi, I believe that your current list of target schools is quite extensive. Applying to so many schools can potentially dilute the quality and focus you should have on your top choices. Considering your background in Oil & Gas, along with your focus on ESG and supply chain, I recommend prioritizing Ross and Tepper as competitive picks, with Kelley, Rice, and McCombs as safety schools. While a GMAT score of 329 is good, it may not be exceptional for M7 schools. As you are an IITian from KGP, I don't see why these would not give you a strong consideration unless you really mess up your applications.

If you are interested in the prestige of your alma mater, I strongly suggest considering the MIT SCM program. Alternatively, you can explore the Ross MSCM or LGO MIT programs, which are among the best in the world for supply chain. These programs open doors to top-tier roles in Strategy and Operations practices at leading companies (MBB). If you see your career path in supply chain and operations leadership, having these affiliations on your resume would undoubtedly impress recruiters when they're scouting for leaders. :)

Aanchal Sahni (INSEAD alum, former INSEAD admissions interviewer)
MBAGuideConsulting
LinkedIn |WEBSITE: https://mbaguideconsulting.com/ | Message: +91 9971200927| email- mbaguideconsulting@gmail.com
User avatar
10 Oct 2023, 20:43
Thank you, Aanchal, I get your point and have revised my list. What's your take on TUCK/Fuqua for my profile? I am fairly clear about getting ahead in the supply chain/consulting domain(Preferably ESG ) with an MBA degree and that is why I didn't choose those supply chain-specific programs. LGO->I am not sure again, I am very positive about the program but a class size of 50 with 40+% female hardly leaves any space for someone like me with an average GPA. So, I kind of considered it but again in hindsight, I am aware of the risk/reward.
User avatar
10 Oct 2023, 22:45
Tuck and Fuqua fall into the aspirational group, in my opinion. US schools receive a high number of applicants with operations backgrounds, and it can be challenging to establish a strong fit with schools that primarily focus on consulting and healthcare and pharma. While not impossible, admission can often come down to factors such as your GPA, GRE score, gender, and more. I don't have a sufficient reference point for operations professionals at Tuck and Duke, but I have substantial evidence of healthcare consultants successfully gaining admission.

Applicants should not base their applications to highly selective programs with limited seats solely on probability.
Not everyone needs to be an outlier in a class. While schools aim for diversity, this doesn't require an exotic background or rare skillset. Admissions committees seek students who will contribute diverse perspectives to the class, and these experiences can come from various sources. Smaller classes also value students from prestigious colleges worldwide, as it enhances their own reputation, which is why they consider applicants like you seriously.

When it comes to the diversity aspect, where you're competing for around 25 seats in a class of 50, don't limit yourself to conventional diversity criteria like race and gender. Think beyond these boundaries and consider your cultural, geographic, and socioeconomic background. Have you overcome significant challenges in life? Have you excelled in a specific field or hobby? Have you had a unique education or work experience? These factors can contribute to your diversity and make you stand out, offering a unique perspective in the classroom.

I recently worked with an applicant of average standing, and he has been accepted into Tepper's Masters in Product Management program. This program is highly selective, with a class size of just 50, and it offers a targeted pipeline into big tech product management roles. It's a logical choice for someone with a product background who sees more value in this program than a traditional two-year MBA at Tepper. It comes with a lower opportunity cost and strong management support. If the school sees why, you might pick LGO over the MBA, and is convinced about your focus on the sector, I don't see why they wouldn't take you. But I guess you should apply where you really want to go..


Aanchal Sahni (INSEAD alum, former INSEAD MBA admissions interviewer)
MBAGuideConsulting
LinkedIn |WEBSITE: https://mbaguideconsulting.com/ | Message: +91 9971200927| email- mbaguideconsulting@gmail.com

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne