1.The author is primarily concerned with
The first paragraph criticizes using GDP as a measure of standard of living while the second paragraph continues to present points against the same. Hence, the primary purpose of the passage is to criticize using GDP as the measure of standard of living.
A. defining a concept while presenting two sides of an argumentIncorrect: Partial Scope. Even though the author does define the concept of GDP, he/she never presents the other side of using it as a measure of standard of living, i.e. the positive side.
B. presenting the merits and demerits of a phenomenonIncorrect: Partial Scope. Once again, the author does not present any merits of using GDP as a measure of standard of living.
C. describing the criticism meted out to the use of a parameter for a specific purposeIncorrect: Irrelevant. The author does more than just “describing” the criticism meted out to GDP for its usage as a measure of standard of living. The author agrees with the criticism and goes on to add to it in the second paragraph. Hence, this choice fails to capture the essence of author’s role in the passage.
D. criticizing a particular usage of a conceptCorrect. This choice matches the main point we came up with earlier in the summary and main point section and then in pre-thinking. As stated in the explanation for choice C above, the author agrees with the criticism of others towards using GDP as a measure of standard of living and adds to it in the second paragraph. Hence, the whole passage is a critique of this usage of GDP.
E. evaluating a phenomenon on the basis of certain unconventional, non-economic parametersIncorrect: Out Of Scope. There is no given information to suggest that the parameters discussed in the passage are unconventional. Also, the author talks about the distribution of wealth and income, parameters that are certainly not non-economic.
2.Which of the following can be inferred from the passage?
A. In countries where there is little disparity in the distribution of wealth, GDP is the best measure of standard of living.Incorrect: Out Of Scope. The author does not talk about a situation in which there is no or little disparity in the distribution of wealth. Also, the author uses other parameters as well to evaluate the use of GDP as a measure of standard of living- measure such as increase in pollution etc. So, it is possible that even in the absence of disparity in the distribution of wealth, there are other parameters which are not accounted for in this particular use of GDP.
B. Increase in pollution and other negative changes negate any increase in national output.Incorrect: Out Of Scope. Although the author does say that such changes need to be accounted for while measuring the standard of living and in turn the well-being of the population and that GDP does not take them in to account, there is no given information to conclude that increase in these negative aspects negate any increase in GDP. This choice is too extreme and not supported by the passage.
C. An increase in the overall goods produced by a nation does not on its own signify a corresponding increase in the quality of these goods.Correct. This choice directly flows from what’s stated in the second paragraph. Please refer to the following extract:
Also, output figures reflect nothing but little on the quality of goods and services produced.
From the above statement, one can deduce that output figures are not really representative of the quality of good produced. In the given context, one can understand that change in GDP does not represent a change in the quality of goods and services produced.
D. The quality of life suffers when workers work for long hours.Incorrect: Out Of Scope. The author does talk about the impact on quality of life of workers working longer than usual hours; now, whether these usual hours are long for some and short for others is an aspect that cannot be decided using the information given in the passage. Hence, the sweeping statement drawn about working for long hours is not supported by the passage.
E. A country with a high GDP is very likely to have uneven spread of financial wealth.Incorrect: Out Of Scope. There is no information given on any kind of proportional relationship between these two parameters.
3. Which of the following is mentioned in the passage?
A. Unemployment black spots and social deprivation are two of the biggest threats to any economy.Incorrect: Out Of Scope. The author does mention unemployment black spots and social deprivation in the first paragraph, but never comments on how relatively significant they are in terms of their impact on the economy.
B. An increase in national prosperity is most likely accompanied by an increase in relative poverty.Incorrect: Out Of Scope. The author talks about a state where it is possible that national prosperity is accompanied by increase in relative poverty but does not say anything about the probability of the same.
C. Even when there is an equal distribution of wealth, GDP fails as a measure of the income of a country.Incorrect: Out Of Scope . The author does not talk about GDP’s strength as an indicator of the overall income of a country. Instead, he/she criticizes it for not representing the distribution of this income.
D. There is an inverse relationship between an increase in the output of goods in a country and the quality of this output.Incorrect: Out Of Scope. No such inversely proportional relationship is mentioned in the passage. The author just says that figures related to the output of goods do not indicate much about the quality of the goods produced. He/she says that in a specific scenario, the quality of goods could deteriorate with the increase in the output.
E. The usage of GDP as a measure of standard of living is linked to measuring the economic health of the population.CorrectThis information is specified by the author in the first sentence of the passage. The author states that:
… GDP is a basic standard to measure the standard of living in a country and in turn the economic well-being of the population
4. Which of the following most aptly describes the function of the first paragraph?
A. To define and criticize the basis of an economic termIncorrect: Irrelevant. The economic term that is defined in this paragraph is GDP and the author doesn’t criticize GDP or its basis per se, but instead the use of GDP to measure the standard of living and economic well-being of the people.
B. To criticize the effort to ignore the marginalized sections in a society by using a particular measureIncorrect: Irrelevant. The author does not make any insinuation regarding any effort to ignore certain sections; he/she just states that in using GDP as a measure of standard of living, certain parameters are not addressed.
C. To evaluate a particular term that is little understood by most countriesIncorrect: Irrelevant. As stated in the explanation for choice A, the author does not evaluate GDP but a particular usage of GDP. Secondly, the author does not say or imply that this term is not understood by countries.
D. To introduce criticism against a particular use of a conceptCorrect. This choice correctly states the idea behind the first paragraph and matches the description we came up with in the passage analysis. The whole point of the first paragraph is to talk about the criticism meted out to GDP for its use to measure the standard of living of the people. The author then carried forward the criticism in the second paragraph.
E. To discuss measures that can increase the relevance of a particular conceptIncorrect: Irrelevant. There is no discussion on or mention of any kind of corrective measures for GDP.