Quote:
Despite sky-high expectations, the global market for kale has remained stagnant for the last five years. However, although retail prices and the amount of kale produced have likewise varied little during the same period, kale farmers have increased their profits by 15 percent over the last two years.
Any of the following statements, if true about the last two years, helps to explain the rise in profits EXCEPT:
A. Many restaurants that serve kale salads decided they would switch to serving kale soups instead, but the amount of kale they purchased stayed the same.
B. Kale farmers adopted a new machine that more efficiently harvests the crop, allowing them to save money on labor costs.
C. The price of a brand of tractor particularly popular among kale farmers dropped precipitously.
D. The kale industry successfully lobbied the federal government for major agricultural subsidies.
E. Soil conditions in kale-growing regions have been especially good, allowing kale farmers to save money on expensive crop fertilizer.
The right answer here is
A. The first step with any CR question is to identify the type, which in this case is a 'Paradox (Except)' question. This means that we have a conclusion that appears to not make sense (
kale farmers have increased their profits by 15 percent over the last two years) and four of the options help to make sense of this conclusion. One does not, and this is the answer.
We know that quantity sold and kale produced have mostly remained the same, as has the selling price. Hence, the only factor that could really affect profits is
cost. Four of the options should address this in some way.
A - Doesn't talk about cost, doesn't talk about any meaningful situation changing. Hence, doesn't resolve the paradox.
CORRECTB - Drop in labour costs would lead to increasing profits.
OUTC - Drop in capital costs would lead to increasing profits.
OUTD - Costs have been offset by subsidies, leading to increasing profits.
OUTE - Drop in capital costs would lead to increasing profits.
OUT - Matoo