Last visit was: 22 Apr 2026, 12:01 It is currently 22 Apr 2026, 12:01
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
lakersgo
Joined: 23 Dec 2002
Last visit: 13 Oct 2003
Posts: 7
Own Kudos:
Location: LA
Posts: 7
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
stolyar
Joined: 03 Feb 2003
Last visit: 06 May 2014
Posts: 1,012
Own Kudos:
Posts: 1,012
Kudos: 1,882
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
lakersgo
Joined: 23 Dec 2002
Last visit: 13 Oct 2003
Posts: 7
Own Kudos:
Location: LA
Posts: 7
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
AkamaiBrah
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Joined: 07 Jul 2003
Last visit: 24 Jun 2009
Posts: 390
Own Kudos:
Location: New York NY 10024
Concentration: Finance
Schools:Haas, MFE; Anderson, MBA; USC, MSEE
Posts: 390
Kudos: 529
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
lakersgo
Digital clocks are preferable to analog clocks with dials because they keep time more accurately, are much easier to read, and have no moving parts to wear out. They also enable children to grasp the concept of time, and to learn how to tell time more easily than they can with analog clocks.

All of the following assumptions underlie the conclusion of the passage above EXCEPT

a) The moving hands of analog clocks do not help children to understand the concept of time

b) Digital clocks are less expensive to produce and to buy than are analog clocks

c) Analog clocks cannot be made to tell time as accurately as digital clocks

d) Even those who learned how to tell time on analog clocks find digital clocks easier to read

e) Analog clocks have no esthetic advantages over digital clocks

The answer is B, but I don't get it. I chose E as I see nothing esthetic mentioned in the passage. Could anyone enlighten me?


The conclusion is the digital clocks are preferable to analog because of (lots of stuff). Omitted is any mention of the aesthetics of the clock. If analog clocks were more esthetic than digital, it is possible that that alone might make them preferable to digital clock.
User avatar
Christian
Joined: 12 Sep 2003
Last visit: 18 Oct 2003
Posts: 20
Own Kudos:
Location: Peru
Posts: 20
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
[quote="AkamaiBrah"][quote="lakersgo"]Digital clocks are preferable to analog clocks with dials because they keep time more accurately, are much easier to read, and have no moving parts to wear out. They also enable children to grasp the concept of time, and to learn how to tell time more easily than they can with analog clocks.

All of the following assumptions underlie the conclusion of the passage above EXCEPT

a) The moving hands of analog clocks do not help children to understand the concept of time

b) Digital clocks are less expensive to produce and to buy than are analog clocks

c) Analog clocks cannot be made to tell time as accurately as digital clocks

d) Even those who learned how to tell time on analog clocks find digital clocks easier to read

e) Analog clocks have no esthetic advantages over digital clocks

The answer is B, but I don't get it. I chose E as I see nothing esthetic mentioned in the passage. Could anyone enlighten me?[/quote]

The conclusion is the digital clocks are preferable to analog because of (lots of stuff). Omitted is any mention of the aesthetics of the clock. If analog clocks were more esthetic than digital, it is possible that that alone might make them preferable to digital clock.[/quote]

Durability is not the same as cost, I vote for B.
User avatar
tektimesys
Joined: 01 Jul 2014
Last visit: 03 Jul 2014
Posts: 1
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Digital clocks are small and less expensive. They are easily portable.

Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Critical Reasoning (CR) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
499 posts
358 posts