|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
27 Aug 2007, 09:17
Kudos
Bookmarks
Hey all,
So... I'm taking the GMAT this wednesday. I've studied pretty hard for about 3 weeks and taken 4 prep tests (2 GMAT Prep and 2 Power Prep). My scores were as follows : 700 and 640, 670 and 670, respectively so I think there is a good chance I will score between 660 and 680 on the actual test.
I graduated from calpoly pomona with a 3.00 GPA majoring in computer science and minoring in mathematics. By the time I apply to UCLA I will have been working for a fortune 500 computer company as a software engineer for 6 years and will have completed my master's in computer science at the same university with a GPA of probably 3.6.
I know that my undergraduate GPA and GMAT score are a little bit low for UCLA, but I'm hoping that my extracurricular activities in high school in college may help a little bit too. In high school I was a really good football player, earning several awards as well as a scholarship to play in college. I was also elected by my teammates to a leadership position on the team (kinda like being a captain). However, I only played one year before transfering back home and starting over at a community college, which probably wont look too good. The other negative thing is that I did take a long time to get my B.S. (7 years). I did work while I was doing it but even still that can't look good.
Anyway... I'm thinking I'm a little short for UCLA but probably right on the money for USC.
What do you guys think? Can I get into Anderson's part time program?
So... I'm taking the GMAT this wednesday. I've studied pretty hard for about 3 weeks and taken 4 prep tests (2 GMAT Prep and 2 Power Prep). My scores were as follows : 700 and 640, 670 and 670, respectively so I think there is a good chance I will score between 660 and 680 on the actual test.
I graduated from calpoly pomona with a 3.00 GPA majoring in computer science and minoring in mathematics. By the time I apply to UCLA I will have been working for a fortune 500 computer company as a software engineer for 6 years and will have completed my master's in computer science at the same university with a GPA of probably 3.6.
I know that my undergraduate GPA and GMAT score are a little bit low for UCLA, but I'm hoping that my extracurricular activities in high school in college may help a little bit too. In high school I was a really good football player, earning several awards as well as a scholarship to play in college. I was also elected by my teammates to a leadership position on the team (kinda like being a captain). However, I only played one year before transfering back home and starting over at a community college, which probably wont look too good. The other negative thing is that I did take a long time to get my B.S. (7 years). I did work while I was doing it but even still that can't look good.
Anyway... I'm thinking I'm a little short for UCLA but probably right on the money for USC.
What do you guys think? Can I get into Anderson's part time program?
27 Aug 2007, 10:42
Kudos
Bookmarks
If you don't mind me asking, what were the circumstances surrounding taking 7 years to complete your undergrad? I only ask, because I took 8 years to finish mine and thought that I was the only one in that kind of situation!
For me, I got married and was working a full-time job and a part-time job for most of my undergrad (the only exception was my freshman year where I was a traditional student). It took me so long because I graduated from Ohio State which is not too friendly towards non-traditional students.
However, I was recently accepted into the PT MBA at OSU and in my application I addressed the issue of the length of time it took me to complete my undergrad. I turned it into a plus, stressing that unlike most other applicants to a PT program, I already have valuable time management skills that would be needed to juggle working full-time while going to school.
For me, I got married and was working a full-time job and a part-time job for most of my undergrad (the only exception was my freshman year where I was a traditional student). It took me so long because I graduated from Ohio State which is not too friendly towards non-traditional students.
However, I was recently accepted into the PT MBA at OSU and in my application I addressed the issue of the length of time it took me to complete my undergrad. I turned it into a plus, stressing that unlike most other applicants to a PT program, I already have valuable time management skills that would be needed to juggle working full-time while going to school.
27 Aug 2007, 10:49
Kudos
Bookmarks
Well,
The truth is that it was a combination of factors.
1) I didn't make it a high priority to finish quickly. I started over at a JC, which is practically free, so I just didn't worry about the time as much.
2) I changed my major a couple of times. At one point I thought that I wanted to study electronic technology. I even earned an associates of science in it. But then I decided to change courses.
3) I ultimately decided to study math and computer science (which requires alot of math). The only problem was that I was terrible at math so I had to start completely over with beginning algebra. I ended up doing extremely well in it, earning straight As all the way through vector calculus and I was also able to get a minor in mathematics. However, I had to start completely over to do it, which took time.
The truth is that it was a combination of factors.
1) I didn't make it a high priority to finish quickly. I started over at a JC, which is practically free, so I just didn't worry about the time as much.
2) I changed my major a couple of times. At one point I thought that I wanted to study electronic technology. I even earned an associates of science in it. But then I decided to change courses.
3) I ultimately decided to study math and computer science (which requires alot of math). The only problem was that I was terrible at math so I had to start completely over with beginning algebra. I ended up doing extremely well in it, earning straight As all the way through vector calculus and I was also able to get a minor in mathematics. However, I had to start completely over to do it, which took time.
